For the next 90 minutes...

[ComedyPilot]

I will be mainly watching ITV4 - Bradley Wiggins documentary, then the new 'Cycle Show'

Do NOT disturb

Thanks.......Ciao

 

[TVC]

I don't want to spoil it, but he won.

 

[PaulB]

Put the bins out before you get comfortable. Hurry up you gazy let.

 

[ComedyPilot]

What part of the words NOT, DO and DISTURB don't you lot underprehend?

 

[ComedyPilot]

Interesting comments by Shane Sutton, that he doesn't think Bradley trained enough for the track, and could have done better - and that he could have laid down some (untouchable) records?

 

[ComedyPilot]

Cycle Show looks promising in it's format - I just hope they don't stick to the racing side - there's a lot more to cycling than racing

 

[ComedyPilot]

The guests doing the Rollapaluza (sp?) adds a nice little 'star in a reasonaly priced car' aspect to the show. I hope they get Mike Hall in to talk about his RTW in 92 days ride......

 

[Maz]

How does the TdF work?
I mean, could BW have been 'caught up' on the last day by anyone?
Is it based on shortest cumulative time over each stage?

 

[Mad Doug Biker]

How does the TdF work?
I mean, could BW have been 'caught up' on the last day by anyone?
Is it based on shortest cumulative time over each stage?

Yes, it is the quickest over all time, you don't need to win every stage... In fact theoretically, you could win without winning any stage at all, but obviously you would have to be consistently near the front of the Peleton when nobody else was.
And yes, Wiggo would have had to have had a major accident for anyone to catch him but it could have happened.

He was something like 2.05 mins ahead of Froome in second place as it was.



.....That was a question and not something off the show was it?