I seem to remember a Buy British campaign or sentiment when I was a boy, mainly by the unions I think. It was a bit of a cheek. Why should you be made to feel unpatriotic for not buying a rubbish British Leyland Allegro when as tax payers we were already subsidizing the workers' jobs, especially when they were on strike most the time.
The problem with this sort of populist soundbite type view is that it only ever gives a snapshot of a position at a given time and from a given angle. It totally fails to encompass how that position was reached, alternate angles and the scope of fallout from various choices. There are a lot of assumptions associated with these little soundbites and they have almost achieved 'urban legend' status. You know, we say them and we tell the tales but we have no direct experience of them, or our anecdotal experience is so limited as to be statistically worthless. If you consider the two ends of the spectrum - a totally free(or at least for capital) global marketplace - a highly protected localised marketplace - neither is particularly appealing, and for the same reasons, they both stifle choice, innovation and freedom.
Too often, it seems to me, we are given either/or type options, red or blue, right or left, global or national, communism or capitalism, etc, etc. It feels a bit like using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, these are broad based choices that then try to shoehorn reality into an ideology, rather than working with what we have and planning for the future. By future I don't mean the next vote. We have some fantastic tools and ideas from all over the spectrum but, as soon as we make that top level choice, suddenly we have all this garbage that comes along with that choice, all the shoot ideas that wouldn't get anywhere on their own merits.