
lol i had the amp set to surround ive since found outThat went right over my head
Happy Hi- Fi day![]()
Oooooooooh I can sense your excitement from herelol i had the amp set to surround ive since found out

A friend who worked at the same audio company invited me round to his house to check out his expensive hifi. We had a few beers as he demonstrated it to me and It sounded fabulous! He told me to try and 'remember' what it sounded like. He then disconnected the speakers and told me that we he had been listening through his old 'cheap' speaker cables which had cost 'only' £50!by the way, make sure your hearing is tip top too
my hearing isn't fantastic (but i'm not near deaf or anything), so i'm more than happy with mp3 sent wirelessly to a budget separates hifi. a friend has all the valve amp malarky, and waxes lyrical about it. can't hear what's so good about it, so why waste money when i can't tell the difference?
We had a few more beers as he demonstrated the 'upgraded' system to me. It sounded fabulous too!Oooooooooh I can sense your excitement from here![]()
I used to work in the audio industry and had a conversation with my M.D. once about expensive signal cables. To say that those cables prevented the mangling of audio signals was one thing, but could somebody please explain how they restored the signals mangled by passing through the rest of the recording/broadcast chain?![]()
I used to read Hifi mags about 30 years ago and they'd have the most ridiculous arguments about things like cables. They'd do the tests and be unable to prove any significant differences and would just claim that the tests hadn't been carried out properly!If the expensive cables worked as the manufacturers claim, it would be obvious to the listener in a double-blind test. The fact that no-one has ever managed to tell the difference in these conditions tells you all you need to know.
