I suppose I may be one of the few here who has actually had to make a public statement about how much they know, as now and then I give evidence in court or planning inquiries and for those purposes I may be classed as an "expert witness". This has in the past led to some interesting discussions with barristers trying to lead me into the pit of oblivion that swallows the unwary. Goes like this;
Him - so you are an expert, Mr B?
Me - I have a good, probably extensive, knowledge of my subject but I prefer not to be described as an expert.
Him - Why not?
Me - because as soon as I answer any question with "I don't know" I'll be challenged as to my status as an expert. I am also of the view that it is not for me to style myself as an expert but for others to make that decision based upon how I present myself and my knowledge.
Him - so you admit you don't know everything about this subject?
Me - yes (keep it short, confuses the buggers no end).
Him - long silence follows hoping I'll fill the void
Me - .......................................
Him - well Mr B?
Me - and the question was?
Snigger from the public brings this to an end and we can get on with the main business of the day, which is him trying to trap me into contradictions and me making sure he fails.
Like others here, I worry about the supremely confident ones you meet now and then, you know the type "there's two ways of doing things, my way and the wrong way". Unfortunately, many of them are politicians, in fact it's probably a pre-requisite for the job.
Gordon