Cab said:
Rationally, I take the point that all other things being equal there isn't any reason to value a childs life more highly than that of an adult. The human being isn't a rational animal though, and our culture doesn't value all people equally.
Sums it up perfectly, yes.
You can look at it both ways - children have more potential, but adults have more investment. The difference I think, is perhaps that you can measure and record investment and acheivement, but potential is seen as limitless - this kid might have found the cure for cancer, or been Prime Minister, or the greatest writer ever. Of course, they might just spend their life sitting at a desk and eating doritos, but no-one knows...
Also, yes, children are seen as innocent and vulnerable - although I think I'm as vulnerable if I'm hit by a car or assaulted as a child is.
And then later on of course, adults become important again, when we become innocent little old people. Dreadful when one is attacked (but people don't care quite so much if the elderly get dumped in homes and left to rot mentally).
For the record, I don't have kids, but I can completely understand the family urge to protect them - when my neice/nephew arrives, I've no doubt I'd lay down my life for it, as I would for my sister, or my Mum, or my best friends. Outside my relationship circle I hope I also place equal value on all lives - just probably a little less than on the lives of my loved ones...