GuyBoden
Guru
- Location
- Warrington
They need a new proof reader, "form the other side"!
Yes, and a new editor. Journalistic proof reading and editing have both gone down the pan in the last 20 years............. (IMO)
They need a new proof reader, "form the other side"!
Nah, it was shoot over 20 years ago when I was a part time reporter in the national Union of journalists (NUJ).Yes, and a new editor. Journalistic proof reading and editing have both gone down the pan in the last 20 years............. (IMO)
Whilst agreeing with your sentiment, Cycling Weekly maintains a pretty high standard of textual accuracy. For your post, though, colon (or nothing) rather than comma, I think.They need a new proof reader, "form the other side"!
Don't you think that blaming 'infrastructure' is a bit unreasonable, in the situation as described. The cyclist was 'roaring along a path' approaching "a small, narrow wooden footbridge". Cyclists should be prepared to give way to pedestrians on shared paths.as far as I can understand, the fall was because of the infrastructure, and if the cyclist had been elderly, that fall might have ended an active life.
Even when they're probably fictional, as I suspect is the case in that article. I would have said the cycle track across Grantchester Meadows was tarmac and without bridges, but it's been a while since I was there so I may be confused. I wait to hear from our reporter on the scene.Don't you think that blaming 'infrastructure' is a bit unreasonable, in the situation as described. The cyclist was 'roaring along a path' approaching "a small, narrow wooden footbridge". Cyclists should be prepared to give way to pedestrians on shared paths.
"His front wheel hit the bridge, and skidded"Don't you think that blaming 'infrastructure' is a bit unreasonable, in the situation as described. The cyclist was 'roaring along a path' approaching "a small, narrow wooden footbridge". Cyclists should be prepared to give way to pedestrians on shared paths.
I don't remember them and I started to look for wooden bridges that you could hit the front wheel on (I'm expecting the bunch of planks bolted together with a handrail sort) on streetview and stopped because I was losing the will to liveYou are correct. The path is tarmac (with a bit of mud in places) and there are no bridges as such - there are a couple of cycle cattle grid bits but these are separate from the pedestrian part.
There are some bridges of the type described but they're actually on Lammas Land/Sheep's Green/Coe Fen.
More than that, it's the punchline. Change it and the entire piece loses its wit.*Pedant mode on*
There's nothing wrong with the use of the word incidentally; the writer is just concluding with a little note to assure readers that despite his idiocy, the ccyclist wasn't seriously hurt.
*off*
That ain't Grantchester.
That ain't Grantchester.