Gains marks for the quill stem, toe clips and horizontal top tube.
Loses marks for the absence of lugs,pokey-uppy loops of brake cables or downtube gear levers.
There must be a few originals still knocking about at the back of garages, and I doubt they'll fetch £2K.
(Nothing wrong with small wheels, by the way. They're lighter, stiffer and quicker to accelerate. Dr Moulton worked out in the 60s that with high-pressure tyres and fine-tuned suspension, any bigger than 17" was a waste of weight. MIT recently came to the same conclusion via a different route. Raleigh/Moultons had quite a succesful track season - small wheels also allow team pursuit riders to draft each other more closely - they were successful enough for the UCI to decide that the definition of a "bicycle" includes a minimum wheel size bigger than 17", in their usual, innovation-stifling way. Moulton/Pashley have more recently compromised at 20" because no-one except Schwalbe make a 17" tyre these days - probably largely because of that UCI ban).