Just how accurate are GPS tracking devices?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

PaulB

Legendary Member
Location
Colne
I ask because I get very different readings between trackers for the same activity.

As an example, my Saturday ride, according to my Garmin Edge 705 shows that the ride was 51.21 miles in 3 hours 20 mins with 3,403 foot of climb. I was wearing my Garmin forerunner 235 watch and that showed the ride was 51.41 miles taking ten minutes longer with a massive difference in the climb - 2,155 foot versus 3,403 on the Edge 705!

https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1802623914

Versus

https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1802366974

For the same ride!
 
Do either of them have have a barometer?
 

GrumpyGregry

Here for rides.
The edge has a barometer, I don't think that model of Forerunner does and the Garmin website and t's & c's are full of accuracy disclaimers.
 
There will always be inaccuracies, enter an area of poor reception, or have a better GPSmodule in one unit and this will be evident.

The trick is really to use these units as a comparison

Do the same ride twice, and if the speed is faster, then you will have been faster, if your heart rate is higher than it will have been higher

Simply because all the inaccuracies and errors are consistent for that unit
 

welsh dragon

Thanks but no thanks. I think I'll pass.
I don't think any of them are accurate. Endomondo says one thing and the LCD unit on my bike say totally different things. I trust the info on my bike more as it doesnt rely on GPS at all. The mileage counter is wired to my front wheel. I know that on my travels my Endomondo signal has dropped out numerous times. I no longer take any notice of what it says anymore.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Accuracy depends on many, many factors. Dedicated GPS devices are likely to be better than phones, but that's not always so. How the different software interprets the data will account for further errors.
 
OP
OP
PaulB

PaulB

Legendary Member
Location
Colne
Strange, I'd have expected the Forerunner to register a greater climb reading as it will record every time you raise your arm to acknowledge another cyclist.
Well to save the effort, I wear a jersey with a big wavy hand on the front so I don't have to take my hand off the handlebars but can still be seen to be greeting them. Doesn't EVERYone have one of those?
 

Globalti

Legendary Member
Bikehike is accurate and you can go back over the profile so as to see where you suffered most.
 

welsh dragon

Thanks but no thanks. I think I'll pass.
Bikehike is accurate and you can go back over the profile so as to see where you suffered most.


I triex looking at that, but couldnt get it to work. Kept saying the http/ wasnt allowed.? I don't think i will bother. :laugh:
 

PK99

Legendary Member
Location
SW19
I ask because I get very different readings between trackers for the same activity.

As an example, my Saturday ride, according to my Garmin Edge 705 shows that the ride was 51.21 miles in 3 hours 20 mins with 3,403 foot of climb. I was wearing my Garmin forerunner 235 watch and that showed the ride was 51.41 miles taking ten minutes longer with a massive difference in the climb - 2,155 foot versus 3,403 on the Edge 705!

https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1802623914

Versus

https://connect.garmin.com/modern/activity/1802366974

For the same ride!


0.4% difference on distance well within quoted accuracy for GPS
5 % difference on timing did you start and stop them exactly simultaneously?
Different method of measuring altitude - barometric vs map
 
The elapsed time is the same on both, 3:30ish, so one probably has an autopause setup and a barometer to do the altitude gain as opposed to working off the basemap. They're both pretty close really.
 
Top Bottom