CopperCyclist
Veteran
It's a collision and the driver has a duty under the Road Traffic Act to stop, report and exchange details. The definition under the road traffic at doesn't require contact in the collision, it just requires that it happened "due to the presence of the motor vehicle on the road". If they didn't stop or refused to give details report it to the police.
The exact thing happened to my father in law. Luckily he runs with a camera so had the registration and evidence needed.
The definition of accident is deliberately wide reaching. For example, both the OP's and @ianrauk examples require the driver to atop and exchange. The issue of who was at fault and who should pay is, as always, for court to decide if the participants can't agree, and for what it's worth I would agree that in Ian's example the car driver shouldn't pay anything - but they are still legally obliged to stop and exchange!
The exact thing happened to my father in law. Luckily he runs with a camera so had the registration and evidence needed.
The definition of accident is deliberately wide reaching. For example, both the OP's and @ianrauk examples require the driver to atop and exchange. The issue of who was at fault and who should pay is, as always, for court to decide if the participants can't agree, and for what it's worth I would agree that in Ian's example the car driver shouldn't pay anything - but they are still legally obliged to stop and exchange!