mididoctors
Über Member
If they hadn’t ridden, he wouldn’t have won.
So, no, it wasn’t obvious, especially after less than 18kms of the stage.
It was a competitive finish . Some lack of kraft on how to win from a group from the others
If they hadn’t ridden, he wouldn’t have won.
So, no, it wasn’t obvious, especially after less than 18kms of the stage.
Given Mads was a unanimous PTP pick, maybe it was obvious before the rollout for the stage.If they hadn’t ridden, he wouldn’t have won.
So, no, it wasn’t obvious, especially after less than 18kms of the stage.
Given Mads was a unanimous PTP pick, maybe it was obvious before the rollout for the stage.
It seemed inevitable to me as soon as Mads found himself in a break of predominantly climbers, that wasn't being chased down, accompanied by 4 teammates who were, of course, always going to ride for him. That was on the descent of the first climb with less than 18km ridden and which was when I called it.
When I talk about everyone riding to make it just so, I'm talking about Philipsen's ridiculous chasse patate rather than using his team to chase and the way the break allowed themselves to be towed along seemingly oblivious to their inevitable trouncing by Pedersen. Even Vine's attack played nicely into Trek's hands.
The interesting part of the stage would have been seeing just how Trek managed to get themselves into such a dominant position but, sadly, there was no coverage of that.
Fair play to Trek and Mads, though. They absolutely nailed that stage.
The big question at the end (although it's was a rhetorical question when I watched it as I already knew the result) was "Has Pedersen done too much/ got anything left for the sprint".
The big question at the end (although it's was a rhetorical question when I watched it as I already knew the result) was "Has Pedersen done too much/ got anything left for the sprint".
Although I'm quite fond of a rider who isn't scared to open his mouth....I can't really be arsed with the pre scripted interviews.It's hard for the athletes to comment on this stuff without sounding like a spoiled brat (leave my bike racing alone, it's important!), hopelessly out of touch (keep sports and politics separate) or getting directly involved the politics.
Jonas has made a decent fist of it above, but I still think he might be better off just reading out prepared statements.
I'm hoping Almeida can take a bit of time on Vinny in the ITT and it all comes down to Stage 20....Bola del Mundo and a GC showdown, not only for the red but for 3rd place as well.So, what do we have left?
A couple of medium mountains - a lumpy one with an 8km 5.2% cat2 finish and a more mountainous cat 1 finish at 8.8km 9.7%, a 27km flat ITT, a sprint stage, a HC mountain top finish (Navacerrada) and a procession/sprint.
All the gaps at the top are pretty small, except for the 1' 50" between Almeida and Pidcock.
Pidders is defending only 32" over Hindley and 52" over Gall.
Hard to see where Almeida can find 48" on Jonas.
Træen is holding on to top 10 and has 2' 19" on Jorgensen in 11th and 5min on Tejada in 12th. Vulnerable to his legs falling off on stage 20.
PS: is Pedersen (237pts) safe from Vingegaard (139)? Practically, yes - but I'm not sure of the maths. If Jonas were to pick up 3 mountainous wins and Mads nothing at all I don't know if that would be enough and can't be arsed to work it out.
I'm hoping Almeida can take a bit of time on Vinny in the ITT and it all comes down to Stage 20....Bola del Mundo and a GC showdown, not only for the red but for 3rd place as well.
Not asking for much am I ?
It's hard for the athletes to comment on this stuff without sounding like a spoiled brat (leave my bike racing alone, it's important!), hopelessly out of touch (keep sports and politics separate) or getting directly involved the politics.
Jonas has made a decent fist of it above, but I still think he might be better off just reading out prepared statements.