potsy
Rambler
- Location
- My Armchair
Have you only just logged in?This is the most absurdly idiotic comment I have read today. No offence like.

Have you only just logged in?This is the most absurdly idiotic comment I have read today. No offence like.
Blimey ...This is the most absurdly idiotic comment I have read today. No offence like.
Actually I think she looks better without the wig, just not sure about the whispy bits ....I don't think I'd ever seen Jo Rowsell with hair until she appeared on the telly as a pundit the other night. It was quite disconcerting. I can understand why she would want to make herself look "normal" when not riding, but it's a shame the world works like that.
None taken.
Why has this become about how female athletes look rather than what I'm talking to be a legitimate query regarding the weight of hair?
Are you saying that Markymark has posted something legitimate. I'm shocked, I really am and so will he be.Why has this become about how female athletes look rather than what I'm taking to be a legitimate query regarding the weight of hair?
I just think she's lovely whatever her choice in the tonsorial department.Actually I think she looks better without the wig, just not sure about the whispy bits ....
This is the most absurdly idiotic comment I have read today.
How can you compare Wiggins' sideburns to a woman who has a medical condition and doesn't have a choice in the matter?@coffeejo I had much the same reaction when I saw this thread title, but to be fair there was a fair bit of banter about the effect Wiggins' sideburns may or may not have had on his performance...![]()
Monkeys and typewriters.Are you saying that Markymark has posted something legitimate. I'm shocked, I really am and so will he be.
The thread title actually refers to the weight of Laura Trott's hair.How can you compare Wiggins' sideburns to a woman who has a medical condition and doesn't have a choice in the matter?