wasn't freddy the kruger the spawn of 100 fathers raping a nun? so there is precedent for multiple fathers.....Patrick Stevens said:Ahem.....I suspect that DNA testing will track down the father.
Do they still use a turkey baster? I thought you had to put a finger in...
Blimey!Patrick Stevens said:There might a shortage of volunteers to fill the turkey baster in future.
Paulus said:There was a bit in todays paper that said the couple had split up. Perhaps the mother was trying to claim benefits, and as far as i know the CSA will come after the father for maintainence once the mother has named the man who "fathered" the child. To my mind this does seem harsh on the doner as he stated he didn't want any involvement with the child or the mother and her partner at the time of the donation. Some people cannot be trusted to keep their side of an agreement, especially when money is at stake.
The law needs to be taught about the birds and the birds, or the bees and the bees! (and then bend the law a bit).simoncc said:The law currently regards women as breeding machines
Oddly I was once in the position of considering the same sort of thing. My conclusion was that I couldn't father a child without taking responsibility - a peculiarly nineteenth century view of the moral purpose of sperm that I'm not particularly proud of. In this instance the reverse was the case - the mothers had no interest in a male presence in the upbringing of their child.
Smokin Joe said:Personally, if I agreed to father someones child I would have at least wanted a shag or two out of it.
Crackle said:If the Daily wail is to be believed he was more involved than the first story implies and she was, to some extent, a victim of cirumstances.
I had no idea that morality finished at the end of the 19th century. I guess all those pregnant parlourmaids with illegitimate children taken care of by anonymous allowances were the progeny of aliens.
We are so lucky that we are able to set our moral compasses by men such as yourself then!