I don't know the wording of the law but surely the allowing of guide dogs is absolutely implicit in the terms of the law to anybody but a complete imbecile, cretin or thinknotwell.Doesn't say "must allow guide dogs" though does it? They could ban dogs and make other "reasonable provision" if they were so minded.
One guard has clearly goofed, as it is pretty inconceivable that Lidl has any such policy.
Putting up a shed without planning permission is possibly "breaking the law", but I'd not expect my neighbours to call the police, though I might quite rightly get a letter from the council.
You may think differently if or when you have the misfortune to be in this position.I don't think qnyone here is defending the shop.
However, it would also require a bit of an effort to establish that banning guide dogs was discrimination according the act - especially as even the dog ban is highly unlikely to be lidl policy. i would think it could well be justified in some circumstqnces - though probably not here to be fair. But As far as I understand it, banning guide dogs is not in and of itself an offence.
And yet we have all thiw righteous indignation "calling the police" and what not.
I might ask, is there more to the story - or is it q pure co-incidence the victim juwt happened to be q councellor?
You may think differently if or when you have the misfortune to be in this position.
I'm not suggesting they go to prison or get the birch, they've broken to law and some kind of community resolution disposal leaves them without a criminal record, yet forces them to acknowledge they acted unlawfully.
Seems to want the guy punished rather than just 'reminded of the law' .Drago's pal isn't asking for the security guard to be sacked, he's asking for an apology from the company and an assurance that all staff will be reminded of the law with regards to assistance dogs. Fair enough I say.
Seriously???Next time we see a video of a van driver cutting up a cyclist, I look forward to a load of people saying it was only a mistake, and that van drivers don't get paid much.
I have asked 3 times but got no answer. Was the person so distraught they couldn't ask to see the manager to clarify the situation?
Nobody is denying an apology is due, more than the person who did it should not be punished harshly as it was most likely a mistake.Possibly. I don't know how I'd react if I was blind and someone tried to eject me from a store. Maybe I'd be calm and collected and ask for the manager, or maybe I'd get a bit flustered or upset and contact the firm by email when I got home. And if I did, I'd expect a full apology.