Oh indeed, he didn't deserve that.but any society where people can get killed, with our without due process, just for being anti-social twerps is not a civilised one.
Good.
Although, dare I say it, the uninsured and unlicenced rider of the high performance electric motorbike (it was a Surron type machine, not in any way an ebike as some outlets are reporting it) equally didn't give a monkeys about anyone else.
It's but for the grace of the big feller upstairs that a genuine innocent (by virtue of being law abiding) person didn't get mowed down by one of these two eejuts.
You can say it, and I agree, but he didn't deserve to be hunted down and driven over. I'd have settled for a tar and feathering.
Sorry, but where/how did you see the stone throwers targeting cars going too fast?What about people chucking rocks off motorway bridges at cars going too fast. If they had been obeying the speed limit the rocks would not have hit the car as they would have been a few meters back. Their lawbreaking contributed to their demise. Do these drivers have tempered sympathy?
He certainly didnt, and I never stated otherwise.
Nevertheless, road criminal-on-criminal doesn't get me so excited. You sleep with dogs, you'll catch fleas sooner or later.
He didn't deserve it. Nevertheless, it was entirely within his gift to have instead been behaving in a law abiding manner that day, in which case he woudn't have fallen foul of a fellow road criminal and would likely still be alive.
Actions. Consequences.