classic33
Leg End Member
There may have been a way of extending the time, but you have to think about the volunteers and others manning stations/checkpoints. And the effect of any extension on them.Perhaps he had no alternative but this comes across as an utter train wreck - was there literally no contingency in place? Someone asked about a time extension and they got shut down rather decisively. I suspect Audax Club Parisienne would have had to agree a time extension and knowing the way the Audax organisations seem to operate, it'd be a mountain to move... People have invested a shoot ton of time and money to participate on this ride and to abort it without any transparent discussions seems pretty unfair. I feel sorry for all the volunteers and riders.
Then consider that it would take only one person getting injured due to the event being allowed to continue, given the weather warning in place, for the event to be stopped for good. Volunteers would be harder find to man the check/rest points for the next time.
I've not done the checkpoint volunteering for a cycling event, but have done for long distance walking events. Going out to locate a person who should have checked in, but has been reported as in trouble isn't a nice thing to do.
From what I've read about the stop, the organisers did the only thing possible, and sensible.