Mo Farah; clean or dirty?

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.
What took you so long!^_^
I'm just oot of my bed after an evening of beer and wine and <cannae remember what else>
 

CanucksTraveller

Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Location
Hertfordshire
When I read the title, all I could think of was:
Ooh Mo, you're so dirty.

S01E02-pQeCJCPC.jpg
 
With revelations this morning outlining the very dubious practices of Alberto Salazar and allegations that he emailed Lance Armstrong boasting just how good these shots he was giving were and offering them to the Texan, how do we now feel about this situation? Is the Salazar-Farah link any less suspicious than the Ferrari-Armstrong link?

Me, I made up my mind some time ago on this dodgy situation but would like to hear the views from those on here. Over to you good people.
I don't trust Salazar. As with any athlete, who's performance stats improve drastically over a short period of time, I don't trust Mo either.
 

Slick

Guru
[QUOTE 4699394, member: 76"]Of all the coaches in all the world he chooses Salazar.

As for the whole 'innocent until proven guilty' malarky, well that didn't seem to the case for the entire Russian team did it? They were all deemed guilty by association on the basis that the coaches were doping some athletes. We know that is what Salazar does, so at best, guilty by association.

And why hasn't come out at the earliest opportunity to cut his links to Salazar, possibly because Salazar has all the documents, data, emails and phone calls showing what they have been up to?[/QUOTE]
That's some jump, comparing the current allegations facing the sport to what happens in Russia. Chinese whispers.
 

Tin Pot

Guru
I'd prefer to see evidence if there is any wrongdoing, rather than speculations of guilt by association.
+1

That said, anyone watching athletics expecting any of the field not to be cheating is huffing a crack pipe so big that I'm surprised they can see the racing at all.
 
Top Bottom