Ha ha - yes!!During winter I and one of my buddies always wear either orange or yellow overshoes. I favour yellow. Moving feet are very visible.
I was grunting my way up a short stretch of 10% in my 42/15 grunting gear. Two little boys were sitting at the side of the road at the top. I just got up there and one called out...
Boy #1: "Nice shoes, mister!"
ColinJ: "I want to make sure that drivers see me..."
Boy #2: "They WILL!!!!"
View attachment 712420
We can do as much as we can to be visible, but if a driver doesn't look, then you are getting run over. I've had two major accidents where I driver didn't even look, just drove through me. At least with a row of lights and bright visible clothing, you can say 'go to spec severs'.
I'd speculate that that is more indicative of the nature of her attention to driving, rather than of what aspect of you on the road was more noticeable. At least she noticed a cyclist and went around, rather than through, you. Plenty of people - most people in fact - when driving cars, manage not to drive into things but cannot describe those things afterwards; quite often they cannot remember the thing being there at all. Whilst that's not a good thing at all, and shows lack of 'full attention', it doesn't mean that the flashing light did not contribute something to her awareness of 'thing to drive around'. At least she recalled a cyclist, specifically.She replied she'd seen a cyclist but didn't notice a light.
l have one of those too, for dark commutes, it travels to work in the pannier-bagsI think bright and/or hi-vis on moving bits work really well on a bike, so obvious place is lower legs and feet.
Boardman retro-reflective gillet/jacket, but it's a bit boil inthe bag unless it's proper freezing or I'm taking it pretty easy.
Agreed on the visibility aspect, in my Kodiaq, I have an orange (sleeved) hi-viz vest in the pocket of the seat, ready to put onA remember, of course, that standard yellow hi vis can actually have a camouflage effect in good sunlight in a rural environment, hence mountain rescue wearing red, etc.
The article indirectly raises a point so obvious that it goes over most people's heads - something done in intuitively in the name of safety rarely actually brings a sefty benefit, and can often make things worse (pver bright day time lights, for example.) If its not been unequivocally proven to keep you safer, it most likely won't no matter what the ingrained public perception may be.