Barnet Goat
Active Member
My neighbour recently submitted a planning application to build an extension to their kitchen on the ground floor. This impacted upon me in that they were replacing a fence directly outside my kitchen (we live in adjoining terraced houses) with their new kitchen wall.
Their plans clearly stated that the new wall would be at the level of the underside of my kitchen roof, this was marginally higher than the previous fence but not significantly so I decided not to object. The work has now commenced and the wall is around two feet higher than indicated on the plans. The new wall is overbearing and affects our outlook but I would guess doesn't affect our 'right to light'.
So, to anyone who has experience of these things, am I able to retrospectively object to their work based on the fact that their planning application does not accurately reflect the work being undertaken?
As an aside, the only person who would have objected to the extension would have been me. Is it a coincidence that they have misrepresented the one contentious aspect of their application? Is that type of behaviour normal with planning applications?
Any thoughts on subsequent issues would also be appreciated, ie if I can complain what is my likelihood of influencing their plans?
Mod note: Thread moved from Society, Culture & Politics
Their plans clearly stated that the new wall would be at the level of the underside of my kitchen roof, this was marginally higher than the previous fence but not significantly so I decided not to object. The work has now commenced and the wall is around two feet higher than indicated on the plans. The new wall is overbearing and affects our outlook but I would guess doesn't affect our 'right to light'.
So, to anyone who has experience of these things, am I able to retrospectively object to their work based on the fact that their planning application does not accurately reflect the work being undertaken?
As an aside, the only person who would have objected to the extension would have been me. Is it a coincidence that they have misrepresented the one contentious aspect of their application? Is that type of behaviour normal with planning applications?
Any thoughts on subsequent issues would also be appreciated, ie if I can complain what is my likelihood of influencing their plans?
Mod note: Thread moved from Society, Culture & Politics
Last edited by a moderator: