New National Planning Policy Framework for England

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

mjr

Comfy armchair to one person & a plank to the next
As part of Burnham's drive to solve the housing crisis, this month they've published an updated National Planning Policy Framework for England at https://gov.uk/nppf

In a country with a postcode lottery of Local Plans, Neighbourhood Planning Documents, Site-Specific Development Policies and other bland names, the NPPF is a baseline which we should be able to use anywhere to encourage cycle-friendly developments and prevent dangerous rider-manglers. When objecting to or supporting development planning applications, we're meant to concentrate on "material planning concerns" and the NPPF is basically "material" everywhere.

There's an introductory video at

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSXPXFyTBCA

but I think it's not correct to equate "settlement" with "town/city" like they do. Settlements could also be villages where there is undeveloped/underdeveloped space inside the official built-up boundary (known as the "red line" or "village fence", in some places).

At first glance, the old Chapter 9 "Sustainable Transport" has been replaced by Chapter 15 titled "Promoting sustainable transport". Chapters 4 "Achieving sustainable development", 5 "Meeting the challenge of climate change", 8 "Ensuring the vitality of town centres", 14 "Achieving well-designed places", 16 "Promoting healthy communities" and 17 "Pollution, public protection and security" may also have useful points.

I'll summarise them when I have more time, unless someone else does it first. It's a big change.
 

Drago

Legendary Member
Location
The Urban Fringe
Itll all be crap anyway. Implementation will be left thr LA's who talk a good fight but in reality pay only lip service to all aspects of active travel.
 

Oldhippy

Cynical idealist
As above I fear in the same way that new housing estates are bound by law to have a percentage that are 'social housing or affordable' it's so simple to sidestep that obligation though.
 
Top Bottom