https://news.stv.tv/world/357036
This seems to be reasonably common now. That is a Jaguar I-Pace. Previous ones seem to have been MG and BMW.
If that was a plane instead of a car they'd all be grounded until it was fixed.
I think the problem here is that the car industry has been consumed by computer fever when they don't have enough experience of designing fail-safe software, and seem to have forgotten the lessons from their own field.
Hydraulic brakes quickly got dual circuits so that you don't lose everything if a hose bursts. I had brake servo develop an intermittent fault on my Capri, and whilst it was entertaining wondering if you were going to get any assist each time you put your foot on the pedal, you did
not lose all braking. I've seen hysterical accounts of sudden PAS failure, and again, I've had that happen when the crank pulley broke midway round a busy gyratory system in the rush hour, and it was no big deal because you do
not lose all your steering.
When I bought my Accord with cruise control I was told all sorts of lurid accounts of people being taken hostage by them, but again it was fail safe: if it didn't cancel when you touch the brake, you could put your foot on the clutch, or take it out of gear, or switch the engine off, or all three.
1 in 27 Audi cars have engine failure compared to 1 in 344 Honda's
As a Honda owner my interest in reliability was piqued when my insurance guy commented on it, and since then, the reliability survey's I looked at always had Honda (and Toyota) in the top 5 most reliable makes. Others just come and go, they never stay. Which once had Honda above average for the cost of a typical repair, but the overall cost was among the lowest because the probability of a breakdown was so much lower. I'd rather have one £400 repair than four £100 repairs.