Actually pedestrians were around before horses were ridden so horse riders and cyclists are borrowing pedestrian infra so my point still applies, we are using the infra created for other users.
Of course that assumes all roads are on the lines of previous routes and that they were actually built for horses and not the carts in the first instance of their existence. Also, there are routes that are newer and were built for motor vehicles too. So many pedantic points to be made here that you are possibly better to accept that roads are for motor vehicles by modern design and the space at the sides of them are for pedestrians. within that we are the interlopers that do not fit the designed for users. I mean what came first, roads for cycles or roads for carts and carriages then later the horseless carriage?
Whatever the true history and your views on this the reality is that modern roads are part of the planning process for motor vehicles. Pavements at the side of the roads for pedestrians. Cyclists have been left to take what is permitted to them. Usually long after those routes were already "owned" by other users. That is real world situation.
I wish someone would tell drivers that the path at the side is for pedestrians, not for them to park their vehicles on.![]()
Still, all this on-street parking acts as an excellent traffic calming measure.
I've cycled on all of the single digit A roads, at least briefly.My pure guess rule of thumb when planning a ride is avoid A-roads with less than 3 numerals. A-roads with a single numeral shouldn’t even be considered.
Why anyone would consider cycling the A2 as above is beyond me.
I've cycled on all of the single digit A roads, at least briefly.
A1
Totally fine in C. London, and even a bit further out, this was just approaching the A406 N. Circular.
View attachment 772195
A2
Obviously as pictured above, but further into Kent it can look like this:
View attachment 772196
Oh, the horror. (The A2 above was a reccy for if I ever do a Watling Street tour, there are some barriers in places that might preclude a laden tourer on the cycle paths, while also seeing that you could actually cycle to Darenth interchange legally. I couldn't believe that there were no "no cycling" signs for the A282 without seeing it for myself).
A3
No personal photos, but I've briefly ridden along it in C. London. The Portsmouth end is fine too.
View attachment 772197
A4
Mostly a nice quiet country road, really. Would be a go-to route for doing London-Bristol, maybe deviating at either end, where the road is at its worst.
View attachment 772198
A5
Quite a varied route, mostly single carriageway.
View attachment 772199
View attachment 772200 A6
Another very varied route, the northern end in particular is pretty quiet.
View attachment 772202
A7
A direct corollary to the A6 in Carlisle.
View attachment 772207
A8
A brief section in Glasgow.
View attachment 772203
A9
A good stint from Wick to the A99 at Latheron.
View attachment 772204
Interestingly it was recently the 100th anniversary of the UK's first purpose built road for motor vehicles (the A127 in Essex). So any road predating that wasn't designed with cars in mind.
https://www.sabre-roads.org.uk/wiki/index.php?title=A127
Of course a lot of roads older than that have been rebuilt and realigned in the past 100 years, and there are plenty of new roads and M ways, but the majority of the network predates the car.
The A127, by the way, is a horrible road. It slices E-W and crossing it in a N-S direction can be difficult. Small N-S roads that used to cross have just been sealed off when it was upgraded to dual carriageway.
Good work! I think this deserves a new thread:
"What's your favourite single-digit A-road?"
(I'd currently say the A6 - because there are sections where you get a good view of the Cumbrian Fells AND Great Dun Fell etc
A9 a close second - hard to beat the Cairngorms - but it does carry a lot of heavy traffic if you choose the wrong time.
Anyway ... )
A lot of the problem is attitude
Many eyars ago I remember 2 things that happened quite close to each other
firstly I was supposed to be in a meeting with some external suppliers for the large company I worked for at the time
They range to say the traffic was bad due to an accident on the M6
some people in the meeting were of the concept that this shows that this company was not looking good if they can;t even turn up on time to a meeting!
I commented that they can;t be held responsible for traffic accidents as they are unpredictable
This was not accepted as an acceptable reason
Shortly after I was due to travel from Liverpool - where I worked - to Sunderland
WHen I arrived I would go to a meeting about some computery thing I was working on but I was taking a couple of colleagues with me
One of the colleagues was running late and someone commented that I would have to drive a bit faster to make up the time
I replied that the time was arrived was fixed at the time we started driving and speeding up would not be happening
Again - this was treated as a bad thing - but in this case I was driving and it was my car so they were rather stumped
both situation show that people regard time as critical even if they are driving long distance
and this leads to an attitude that if you are running late then you HAVE TO GET A MOVE ON
which is not how it is supposed to work - the M6 is running slow then you get delayed and the people expecting you should allow for this and have some flexibility
but they don;t so sales staff end up having meetings with fixed times and feel that they have to drive fast to meet the deadline
which explains a lot of the idiotic driving I see on roads IMO
All reasons why my employer has been discouraging (but not 'banning') car travel for business for at least a decade. When it comes to business meetings, there aren't many places you can't get to by public transport with a bit of planning, and with the advent of remote working technology it's easier than ever to avoid the travel completely.A lot of the problem is attitude
Many eyars ago I remember 2 things that happened quite close to each other
firstly I was supposed to be in a meeting with some external suppliers for the large company I worked for at the time
They range to say the traffic was bad due to an accident on the M6
some people in the meeting were of the concept that this shows that this company was not looking good if they can;t even turn up on time to a meeting!
I commented that they can;t be held responsible for traffic accidents as they are unpredictable
This was not accepted as an acceptable reason
Shortly after I was due to travel from Liverpool - where I worked - to Sunderland
WHen I arrived I would go to a meeting about some computery thing I was working on but I was taking a couple of colleagues with me
One of the colleagues was running late and someone commented that I would have to drive a bit faster to make up the time
I replied that the time was arrived was fixed at the time we started driving and speeding up would not be happening
Again - this was treated as a bad thing - but in this case I was driving and it was my car so they were rather stumped
both situation show that people regard time as critical even if they are driving long distance
and this leads to an attitude that if you are running late then you HAVE TO GET A MOVE ON
which is not how it is supposed to work - the M6 is running slow then you get delayed and the people expecting you should allow for this and have some flexibility
but they don;t so sales staff end up having meetings with fixed times and feel that they have to drive fast to meet the deadline
which explains a lot of the idiotic driving I see on roads IMO
Ban farmers from putting cows in fields with public rights of way crossing them. If a farmer ignores, and someone is killed, then a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. Seems a useful piece of legislation to go through parliament given the risks and harm, yes?