smokeysmoo
Legendary Member
- Location
- Bolton, not very far from Nob End
I've picked up some legal jargon after my time on CC, so it is with some authority I can say that the legal term for this individual is....................a cockwomble 

Case was today. We don't know the outcome although its finished as they broke for lunch after the driver the cyclist and myself had given evidence. The case will be finished now, and we are to phone back next week.
Lets just say having taken photographs on my phone totally undid everything he said. He said his car was facing down the road, then prosecution solicitor butted in and showed the photographic evidence.
The driver represented himself and came up with some crazy accusations towards myself and the injured rider. He had accused the injured rider of racing me and the other rider, not the case. He kept going on about where the car was, but I explained that the car had not moved since it stopped after hitting the cyclist. I was accused of telling the rider to stay down because he could make a big component claim. I had told the rider to stay down as he went head first into the ground, had marks on his shoulder, cuts to the face and hands and needed medical attention. I had then gone back to my bike to call an ambulance as the driver had refused to do anything, and I made sure the magistrates were told that.
The driver said I had gone in the ambulance with the rider to hospital, I explained that I had remained on scene to give the officer my statement, then spoke to the landlord about storing the guys bike, then I had cycled to work (why would I have left my bike).
The driver was trying just about anything to say we were wrong or colluding. Anyway, the support staff said they couldn't believe what he was saying as they had heard all the evidence (we could chat about it after we were dismissed). Oh and the driver has admitted liability on the civil PI case.
The driver was going on about the injured cyclists bike not being in the pictures, but it was in one leant against a bollard. I explained that the bike was next to the rider, but we had left it there until the police had arrived and it was the officer how moved it. The guy was trying everything to say he had not performed an illegal u-turn leading to the driving without care and attention charge.
Will update when we have the verdict. As said the case is now complete so I can talk about it.
Just unbelievable.
" A man who represents himself in court has a fool for a lawyer and an imbecile for a client."
well done..
so there's no penalty for lying in court any more ? Isn't that perjury ? Or do people not bother ?