Gerry Attrick
Lincolnshire Mountain Rescue Consultant
Don't kid yourself. It has happened to more than a few other posters on here. They just dare not come clean! Nevertheless, much sympathy and virtual hugs.
I almost did that yesterdaythat some one could fall off cycling in a staight line with no traffic around![]()
Brock said:More ammo for my developing theory that cyclists should not be encouraged or expected to give hand signals.
summerdays said:Hmm don't have a cam.. besides you would all be pissing yourselves that some one could fall off cycling in a staight line with no traffic around![]()
02GF74 said:eh? If a cyclists cannot cycle with one arm on the bars, then you have to queation whether they should be allowed on the roads until they can. It is a bit like driving with one hand on the steeing wheel, and other on the gearstick say. Ok, so you won't fall off in a car but the princicple still applies.
Not having a dig at the OP, these things happen. You need to practise in a safe and soft area. Hand signals are quite fundamental to survival on the road.
goo_mason said:I'm all for indicating my intentions when I can, but recently I've been finding that lots of looking backwards (and stopping pedalling whilst doing so) seems to work just as well with cars behind holding back and giving me lots of room to move out. They seem to better interpret that as a sign that I'm about to move over. Weird how signalling well in advance before making a manouevre doesn't elicit the same response from drivers.
D-Rider said:Sometimes it seems that they see you signalling intent and decide to get past before you can manouver... a bit like not letting other cars into their traffic stream. Whereas if you're just glancing back and drifting over (I think) they see you as less predictable. I'm not suggesting for a minute that we shouldn't signal BTW!
HLaB said:+ 1 I've found that too sometimes, yet other times a clear signal is much more effective, its like everything in commuting comletely unpredictable.