Pedantry and the state of written English.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

Svendo

Guru
Location
Walsden
I got into an offline argument yesterday when emphasising the importance of words like 'all', 'some', 'most', 'often', 'rarely', 'sometimes', and 'usually' and how 'all', 'none', 'never' and 'always' have very specific meanings which should limit when they are used.

"Men/women never ..." (Not true unless the following statement is something like "... run 100 metres in 3.6 seconds."

"Women/men always ..." (Not true unless the following statement is something like "... live less than 1,000 years."

"All of your xxx are ..." (Probably not true!)

"None of your yyy are ... (Probably not true!)

I was accused of being a pedant when my response to "You never ... " was "Oh yes I do - I did that 10 minutes ago and you know that I did!"

"Well you didn't do that last week!"

"I agree! Sometimes I don't ..."

"You are being pedantic - it's the same thing!"

15 minutes of further pedantry followed ...

Can I add 'unique' to that list of overused hyperbolies?
 

Jezston

Über Member
Location
London
'Literally'.

"I literally laughed out loud when I saw that!"

Really? Literally? As opposed to what? Figuratively laughing out loud?
 

swee'pea99

Squire
"I literally died..."

Then again:

Icdnuolt blveiee that I cluod aulaclty uesdnatnrd what I was rdanieg. Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch atCmabrigde Uinervtisy, it dseno't mtaetr what oerdr the ltteres in aword are in, the olny iproamtnt tihng is taht the frsit and lsat ltteer bein the rghit pclae. The rset can be a taotl mses and you can still raedit whotuit a pboerlm. This is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raedervey lteter by istlef, but the word as a wlohe. Azanmig huh? And tehy tlel you slpeling is ipmorantt!
 

benb

Evidence based cyclist
Location
Epsom

Hmm, yes. But it's only because the spelling of those words is well understood that the passage is intelligible. If someone did it with words you had no knowledge of it would be gibberish. So in fact, it underlines why correct spelling is important.
 

Norm

Guest
Can I add 'unique' to that list of overused hyperbolies?
And ultimate, which doesn't mean biggest or best but last. The ultimate xxx shouldn't be referring to the best xxx, it's the last one made. Sadly, that's a lost battle, I feel, as accepted custom drags it away from its roots.

I do have hope for derivatives as penultimate is still used to mean the last-but-one and "ultimately" is generally a synonym for "finally", although even that one is blurring with many people using it to mean "fundamentally".
 

deptfordmarmoset

Full time tea drinker
Location
Armonmy Way
Hmm, yes. But it's only because the spelling of those words is well understood that the passage is intelligible. If someone did it with words you had no knowledge of it would be gibberish. So in fact, it underlines why correct spelling is important.

+1

Exactly. I thought that I was the only one to have realised that we can only quickly rearrange the spelling using the first and last letter as a guide because the correct pattern is well established. We need standardised spelling before we can rely on the fact that there is a pattern.
 
OP
OP
Fab Foodie

Fab Foodie

hanging-on in quiet desperation ...
Location
Kirton, Devon.
You claim to be dyslexic in your post but your previous posts were in good English – are you a part-time dyslexic?

If you're referring to my original post, I stated that I am the parent of a dyslexic, not dyslexic myself (or not knowingly).
 

theclaud

Openly Marxist
Location
Swansea
I don't know what to say to be honest! So I'll swiftly move on.:rolleyes:

Luckily, Rich, I do ;). Mr Hippo's post illustrates perfectly exactly how little correlation there is between an obsession with correct or standard English and the quality of Having Something Worthwhile to Say. So (for example) GaryA remains an asset to the forum however many bizarre spelling variations on the word "bourgeoisie" he seems determined to come up with, whilst no amount of care that Mr Hippo might take with his spelling would redeem his almost entirely worthless contributions. Picking people up on their spelling and grammar is rude and imperious, so the only time it is justified is when one intends to be rude and imperious.
 

Moodyman

Legendary Member
Pedantry and the state of written English. Should it be a forum/general issue?

I sympathise with your exasperation Fab Foodie. But may people who post on here, me included, do so in between their work. They may be time constrained, avoiding the gazing eyes of their boss or simply trying to convey their point as succintly as possible.

In my line of work, I do written communications for and from senior management in a blue chip company. I would never consider speaking words like 'Gonna' or 'shoulda' let alone writing them down, but happily use them on CC.

I view Cycle Chat as a 'fun and friendly place' and whilst this isn't a licence to write in text message language, I think we shouldn't look down upon those who are less formal.

Though, I still get riled by the inappropriate use of double-negatives - I ain't no fool'.
ohmy.gif
 

Moodyman

Legendary Member
I just don't get this. That seems to me an entirely appropriate use of a double negative.

A double negative intended to be interpreted as a positive is the correct use. It's when folk use them to make a negative point.

To me, 'I ain't no fool' means 'I am a fool'. But it's often used to say 'I am no fool' which surely, is grammatically wrong.
 

wobbler

Active Member
Location
Wolverhampton
Well, as my old head master used to say.

"Woy cor yow spake propa"

Wow! Chrome red lined every word in that sentence. Don't worry I've added them all to it's dictionary.

I try to spell words properly, but I know I use the wrong ones most of the time. I really hate the words; Could and would, is there an easy way to remember which is which?

And while you are at it, is this ; the correct punctuation thingy, is it a semi-colon, or a whole colon, or what?

And I was taught not to start a sentence with the word "and". But I've done it twice now because it is easier than saying. "Another thing I want to know is".

I don't mind if anyone fancies a go at putting that lot into proper English. I was not in a hurry when I wrote it, it is just the way my brain thinks. Reading it back I know it does not sound right, I honestly don't know what to change to make it better.

Thanks in advance

Rich
 
Top Bottom