Police Action Over Pavement Cyclist!

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

raleighnut

Legendary Member
 

puffinbilly

Veteran
My sympathy lies with the police on this - these toddlers are an absolute menace, they're in pushchairs nipping at your ankles, on bikes without pedals or lights even seen them in cars with no indicators and tax and no windows and pedals instead of an engine. Absolutely appalling behaviour - they sometimes even stop and urinate in the street.....it's a fine line... recently even seen them in tractors and fire engines on the pavements.....next thing you know in a few years time they'll be ruling the world.
 
OP
OP
classic33

classic33

Leg End Member
It's a true story. The police officer (and I'm not convinced it wasn't a Plastic Plod) has been identified and spoken to.

That said, the response from CTC was actually incorrect...
A "Plastic Plod" PCSO, wouldn't be allowed to drive a marked police vehicle though.
 

davefb

Guru
It's a true story. The police officer (and I'm not convinced it wasn't a Plastic Plod) has been identified and spoken to.

That said, the response from CTC was actually incorrect...

Why was the CTC guy incorrect? I'm assuming mean the quote about under 10 you "can't break the law" due to being under the age of criminal responsibilty.

[edit]
oh and seen coppers on bikes in the local town centre, where it's both perfectly okay at sensible speed, but also where the cops/council did a publicised clamp down on people cycling on the same pedestrianised area..
 
I disagree. I think the link makes it clear that it is perfectly legal to film the police at work unless your purpose is to prepare an act of terrorism.

Can somebody make clear what was wrong with the CTC case? I assume we are talking about the man on BBC Breakfast. I know that there is a difference between a child breaking the law and whether they can be prosecuted for it. Was that it?
My understanding is that the only real law on this is the one from the 1860s that forbids velocipedes being ridden on a footway beside a carriageway. The (presumably) CTC guy on TV said this had been modified by a Home Office ruling in 1999 that permitted cycling on the pavement as long as it was done considerately. Is that about right? This is all a bit theoretical as I do not, personally, ride on pavements, but I would like to know what the rules actually are.
 

cd365

Guru
Location
Coventry, uk
Freedom to photograph and film
Members of the public and the media do not need a permit to film or photograph in public places and police have no power to stop them filming or photographing incidents or police personnel.
 

w00hoo_kent

One of the 64K
This seems to be pretty comprehensive on photography rights. There's also a 'my rights as a photographer' sheet online somewhere that I know some people carry with them so if they get hassle they can produce this and read chapter and verse to the police. The basic situation is a reasonable number of people in uniforms don't actually know the law (in this case).
 
Top Bottom