You lot are putting me off getting a powermeter will I turn in to a bombastic statistic freak?!
Have they not told you about the induction process?
You lot are putting me off getting a powermeter will I turn in to a bombastic statistic freak?!
With that attitude i would have to actually stop doing things until they had been scientifically proven!With n=1 your trial and error won't really allow you to know what it was you did that resulted in an improvement though. You're concentrating on this efficiency thing obviously, so if in a years time you have improved then you'll likely claim it's because you worked on this element of your cycling. You actually need someone to study this in a controlled way - too many variables for you to 'test' yourself!
Where do i say i am a fan boy or even a fan? I am talking in general. If you are here just to start or continue an argument could you please do so with someone else. I bore easily.:troll:
Do you read this stuff after yourself, or do you just say whatever occurs to you at any point in time without processing it at all?
With that attitude i would have to actually stop doing things until they had been scientifically proven!
I agree. My argument may not convince others. It's an option i have chosen, just as i would choose a bike. If it fits me then that's all that matters, to me.I didn't mean that. Obviously you can do whatever you want to do, but if you want to start promoting a particular way of training then n=1 is not enough to convince most people.