Question and poll

[col]

No one has disagreed with the point that to have a go at someone just to get them angry is wrong. No one.
The problem is that the situation you're proposing is artificial and in no way a representation of any incident that has been reported in this forum. Its a meaningless and, in context, loaded question. But you've failed to respond to this criticism in any constructive way.



As a question on its own it is a complete no brainer. Thats the point of the criticism of this poll that has been put forward; you cannot extend the results to make any reasoned comment on anything we have ever seen discussed, nor is it likely to be the case that we'll see such a thing.

You believe that some contributors here have a go at motorists just to get them angry. You've admitted this. Therefore you've chosen to put this poll on the forum to demonstrate why they're wrong. In your mind this demonstrates that those people who have argued against you are wrong, and you're probably even convincing yourself that by their own standards, they're wrong. But its an argument constructed on the flimsy basis that other contributors here are dodgy sociopaths going around trying to start fights with motorists, which, simply, is not the case.

THANKYOU
Even though i have said some on here seem to do it on purpose i stand by that,iv never said they are dodgy sociopaths?You did

 

[Cab]

THANKYOU
Even though i have said some on here seem to do it on purpose i stand by that,iv never said they are dodgy sociopaths?You did

Oh, sorry, you believe that they're going out to start an argument for no particular reason, but you're excluding them from being defined as 'sociopaths'. Fine, have it your way, the semantic tool you're using is merely a more subtle insult to the intelligence of the reader.

 

[col]

Oh, sorry, you believe that they're going out to start an argument for no particular reason, but you're excluding them from being defined as 'sociopaths'. Fine, have it your way, the semantic tool you're using is merely a more subtle insult to the intelligence of the reader.

Or so your trying to make itThe ones iv noticed always end up claiming they did nothing,but in reality they probably knew axactly what they were doing.And i dont call them sociopaths,i call them trouble makers or stirrers.

Oh,apology accepted

 

[BentMikey]

*tumbleweed*

 

[col]

you admit it then. You admit that you can't cope with the real world of the incident, so think that you can start a separate thread and think that people voting yes are saying that you were right over there.

You're right, it is a simple enough question. Not one that needs a poll, unless you're trying to wriggle out of something.

Your skills are second to non,as usual

So why didnt you answer it in the first place,you crack me up ,really you do

 

[col]

I never said otherwise, you saucepan.

So what's your next post going to do -admit that you started this thread because you made such a mess on the other thread and thought no-one would notice you trying to manipulate some support, or deny it? You've done both, and are skipping backwards and forwards between the two at the moment.

Do continue...

I know you may not realise this,but then you probably do and your trying to get away from it,but i have only been responding to your posts,you tin of milk
So do carry on

 

[col]

I never said otherwise, you silly boy.

So what's your next thread going to do -admit that you started this because you made such a mess on the other thread and thought no-one would notice you trying to manipulate some support, or deny it? You've done both, and are skipping backwards and forwards between the two at the moment.

Do continue...

Why did you change the wording in your post?

 

[col]

So what is it Col? Complete co-incidence, or are the threads linked?

Already been answered,or are you not reading the thread properly?

 

[col]

Yup. Read it. You're swinging between admission and denial.

Which is it?

Which is what?

 

[col]

Now, I could either ignore you because the point has been made and you've now made an equally good hash of it on both threads, or keep stringing you along so that you'll carry on doing it.

Now, hmmmm, which will it be...

You tell me

Hey iv just noticed you have the word live in your sig,spooky or what ?

 

[col]

*tumbleweed*

Oi hadnt you plonked me? ,you plonker

 

[BentMikey]

*points at the tumbleweed*