Is it not like a one sided slanging match at the moment where we are demonising the guy more and more and more. All I am suggesting is to let him know he is being discussed and give him the opportunity to give his side of the story.
As for the bigger boy coming to smash the ball in our face, I would have thought quite the opposite. He would have to be very very bold to come on here and argue his side. I don't think he would be given an easy ride. Lets face it BSRU's video says it all. I would have his driving license!
<troll>Looking at the vid again. The initial close overtake; Providing the van driver normally gives cars 6" space when overtaking, then he has not contravened anything in the highway code. As it says you should give vulnerable road users as much space as you would a car (and note the should not must)
And what was BSRU doing in that strange road positioning behind the van just before he turned left, for some reason not entirely clear to us he was right in the drivers rear view mirror. Something happened here to upset Mr Van Driver!
OK there was a very very very minor bump that caused no damage, if BSRU had not pumped his rear tire up with his track pump that morning then the bump would not have even registered - you would have to be excessively pedantic to class that as a collision.
The van driver then ask why BSRU was calling him a w*nker - BSRU says he wasn't and the van driver leaves it at that. </troll>