Pro Tour Punditry
Guru
Really , by who?
I think you are asking who has influence - and if so I am amazed you have to ask.
Really , by who?
Name them...I think you are asking who has influence - and if so I am amazed you have to ask.
how? the teams the old firm are playing is making money out us, if its wasn't for rangers and celtic we would have no scottish football, folk need to remember that.
Have a read at this, @tug benson . It pretty much sums up what is going on at Rangers. Like it or not, they are well on their way to oblivion and IMHO that is not a bad thing.
I say that as someone who used to support them. Not in a fanatical way, but they were certainly my favourite Scottish team and I went to the occasional game. That was then, this is now. They are a shadow of their former selves, owned and run by very shady characters. Their history is tainted by the fact that their was some very dodgey financial deals being done which gave them an unfair advantage. As far as I am concerned, the Rangers which I supported no longer exists. It died when David Murray sold up. The present reincarnation are an embarrassing outfit who will not be missed when the inevitable happens. The sooner the better; it's like watching a once fit and healthy dog slowly dying instead of doing the kind thing and putting it out of its misery!
Scotland will be a better place without them, and that applies to the mob on the other side of Glasgow too.
They may be given a reprieve as they have influence, but it will only be a matter of time before the majority voice is heard.
Your team is loathed by the majority.
Your "loyal" support only lasts when there are good times as can be seen by the dropping attendance. The majority of the "away" fans are the SCUM LOYALISTS (and I think even you would acknowledge that) and they have been a disgrace.
Hate speech laws in the United Kingdom
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Hate speech laws in the United Kingdom are found in several statutes. Expressions of hatred toward someone on account of that person's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, or sexual orientation is forbidden.[1][2][3] Any communication which is threatening or abusive, and is intended to harass, alarm, or distress someone is forbidden.[4] The penalties for hate speech include fines, imprisonment, or both.[5]
Your point?
That your post could be breaking hate crime laws
Which part of what you quoted gives you that idea?
The Loyalist scum part .
No, what part of the "person's colour, race, nationality (including citizenship), ethnic or national origin, religion, or sexual orientation" refers to loyalists? Is loyalism a race? It's not a religion, so we can discount that.
Loyalists are an ethnic group
Are you sure?