Cloak of invincibility innit...aka stupidity (apparently due to the male teenage brain not being fully developed

... if it ever is

)
True
Yes, I was once teenaged, but can't remember riding about without lights
@confusedcyclist
Just a response, not arguing about it
I'll presume that his (possibly) human rights(?) allow him to travel in a manner that he chooses
But...
Riding 'otherwise, than in accordance', as the phrase goes (no legally required light/reflectors)
He was (basically) invisible -as stated, I'm attuned to the shape (but I've been in with drivers, who aren't, till I've said "there's a bike")
It's a busy-ish road at that time, as there can be a lot of shift workers leaving the industrial estate further down, surrounding jct 31/M62
He'd have not been seen, until too late(?) if an uphill vehicle decided to overtake another
If there was any incident/knock-down/RTC, there could be repercussions, if he tried to claim from the motorists insurance
He'd probably not get a penny, due to the lighting issue (not legal for road use) & could even have an attempt to recoups some costs from him, by the insurers
Does hardly anyone these days stop to think how absurd it is that we demand that all others conform to the whims of motorists and ride with lights, reflectors and reflective gear at night
No, because I want to be seen/get home safely
Also, in my case, it'd be far too embarrassing arriving at work, in an Ambo, & being treated by Paramedics/Nurses/Doctors/Radiographers, that I know (& probably know the Police Officer, who'd come to interview me)