because a cyclist's requirements would clash with those of other road users, because the road network already exists and is almost rntirely laid out for cars, buses and trucks, because cars, buses and trucks make up the vast majority of road traffic
and they pay road tax of course
Firstly, a bike is classed as a 'carriage' so is meant to be ridden on the 'carriageway'. Road in other words, hence why it's an offence to cycle on the pavement.
Also, there is no such thing as road tax. You pay vehicle excise duty on your car but this is wrongly assumed to be road tax.
Which leads me to believe that roads should
have been designed for cyclists in mind. Although I feel, as a car driver (I'm a very new cyclist) that they haven't always and ever since riding on the road recently I've realised that this is the case. I do agree that there is a huge difference between the number of cyclists compared to drivers.
So to sum up.. Roads haven't always been designed with cyclists in mind but cyclists should expect new roads (and old roads) to be designed with cyclists in mind because it is in the highway code and there are laws surrounding that.
P.S. I only know this because I was googling around the other day.