campbellab
Senior Member
- Location
- Swindon
My reaction when the lights go amber is to put my foot over the brake. Others' reactions are to floor the accelerator. 

... its a good job the bus driver was awake and looking. although it would have been bus drivers fault no doubt
I bet that started out as irony but, half way through, it all started to come out. Admit it, straight after typing that you had a quick sneak at the ABD website.They should get off the bloody road, that's what they should do. I've paid my taxes, I've got RIGHTS. I hate getting stuck behind one of them for hours on end, only for the bstard to go past me when I'm waiting in traffic. Don't they know that's illegal? One even had the gall to swear at me when I asked him to move over to the left so I could get past - he reckoned I was too close! Didn't bloody hit him, did I? Maybe I will next time.
I bet that started out as irony but, half way through, it all started to come out. Admit it, straight after typing that you had a quick sneak at the ABD website.![]()
Green means "Go if it is safe to proceed". It doesn't mean "plough through the junction regardless of what's ahead."Not that the cyclists are in the right, or course, but it bears restating.
Here in Manchester & Crewe, some busses even the score by jumping the lights themselves. Along with the cars, it's also very common to see them indulging in the popular practice of blocking pedestrian crossings in slow/stationary traffic, having rolled over the stop line on amber or red. At one junction in Manchester, I've seen a bus driver get the hump with a car driver not letting him out of a stop, and chase the errant driver through a red light. Luckily for me, I don't expect sense from other people on the road any more, and I wouldn't trust the drivers of certain bus companies as far as I could throw them, bus and all - all of which meant I didn't end up in the middle of the bus/car altercation - a less experienced cyclist or pedestrian could well have done.
A driver LOOKING? Observing the road and driving appropriately? Not exercising his right to crush those who dare disobey traffic law?oh this wasn't a lone cyclist arriving at the red light just as it changed, this was a good 30 seconds after the lights had changed, and whoosh 3 went through . i would guess that this has happened to the driver at this junction before ,as he was looking .
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, isn't it?would this green means proceed if safe , be the direct opposite of "you MUST stop at the line when the signal is red ? "![]()
A driver LOOKING? Observing the road and driving appropriately? Not exercising his right to crush those who dare disobey traffic law?
Maybe he should get a badge, or something. We'll do medals for the ones that bother to obey the posted speed limits consistently, shall we?
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying, isn't it?
Gah.
No argument from me, I don't RLJ, driving, or cycling.I was highlighting the must. which means just that, its not optional.
Ha! I've been hooted for not proceeding around a roundabout (vehicle to my right wasn't indicating to leave, but as I suspected, continued around the RAB ahead of me - I'd clocked his road position & figured that it was going to happen).I saw a good argument this morning though 2 car drivers at it as one had waited at the first line at an ASL as the road ahead wasn't clear to proceed without blocking the junction. the one behind didn't like it and was quite vocal about it. Had i had time i would have watched the conclusion.
Things may well be different for me, out here in the provinces, but many are laughably inattentive, even when they aren't distracting themselves by texting, or yakking on the 'phone. They're also dangerously impatient, and either unwilling or unable to read the road ahead (evidenced by pointless acceleration and dangerous overtaking to the next set of (red) lights/queue of traffic).buit its pointless trying to get people to understand that basic concept that all drivers are not homicidal maniacs