Scart leads/HDMI

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

fossyant

Ride It Like You Stole It!
Location
South Manchester
Scart to HDMI converters work well enough. We had to get one to connect FIL's hardly used DVD/Video player as we needed to go through all the old VHS tapes as he had a habbit of recording family stuff on any old spare VHS tape.
 

markemark

Veteran
Get a decent quality cable, not a cheapo.

If the cable is digital and it’ll be plugged in and then left, what benefit is there to anything other than the cheapest? The digital signal doesn’t degrade wirh cheap cables/connections like analogue does and the ports won’t wear if plugged and forgotten. I don’t believe there’s any benefit to a more expensive digital cable.
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
I reckon you'd get a modern dvd or even a blueray player for a few tens of pounds which wouldn't be vastly more costly than a cable I reckon. Convertors (as opposed to a mere connector changer) can be hit or miss.

My own experience with a convertor was to adapt my apple pc to HDMI for work presentations, and whilst it did mostly work, it wasn't a good look having problems connecting when you are making a proposal on technical matters.
 

albion

Guru
Location
Gateshead
A quick check on my TV. 4 HDMI + composite and audio.
Likely you already have the required composite leads. When there is no scart there is usually composite which is scart compatible, scart carrying composite.
 
Last edited:

MontyVeda

a short-tempered ill-controlled small-minded troll
I’d be surprised if the old dvd player does not have hdmi as dvd players are digital and scart is analogue? I would imagine it has both. I’d certainly m check this out before buying a new dvd player. If it does an hdmi cable is cheap as chips. Buy the cheapest one that is long enough as they’re all the same.

Not according to the salesboy in Currys... only the £100 cable with give proper blu-ray quality :rolleyes:
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
If the cable is digital and it’ll be plugged in and then left, what benefit is there to anything other than the cheapest? The digital signal doesn’t degrade wirh cheap cables/connections like analogue does and the ports won’t wear if plugged and forgotten. I don’t believe there’s any benefit to a more expensive digital cable.

There's benefit in an OK quality one over a shonky poorly made one, in terms of good connectors and thick enough not be easily broken with wear.

I totally agree there is no value in super expensive cables as favoured by some hi-fi types, and claiming improvement of digital signals is silly as well as merely false
 

markemark

Veteran
There's benefit in an OK quality one over a shonky poorly made one, in terms of good connectors and thick enough not be easily broken with wear.

I totally agree there is no value in super expensive cables as favoured by some hi-fi types, and claiming improvement of digital signals is silly as well as merely false

I don’t believe there’s any difference in quality. It’s digital signal. It won’t degrade in a 2m cable with a cheap connector. Their output will be identical. It may break if pulled in and out a thousand times but it’s a dvd player and tv. It’ll be plugged in once and left. A cheap one will do the exact same job as a mid range and an expensive one.
 

Pblakeney

Über Member
I know. But I suspect the dvd has an hdmi out as well as scart. Tge scart was used for the old tv. The dvd may have scart only but Id check first.

Not necessarily. DVD player were released long before HDMI became widely available. Chances are a new DVD player will cost not much more than the required cable though. I have a drawer of cables that can connect anything to anything. 😉😂
Comes in handy as I want to digitise old family videos one day.
 

markemark

Veteran
Not necessarily. DVD player were released long before HDMI became widely available. Chances are a new DVD player will cost not much more than the required cable though. I have a drawer of cables that can connect anything to anything. 😉😂
Comes in handy as I want to digitise old family videos one day.

Possibly it does not have one. But an hdmi cable if it does cost c£4 from Amazon. I’d be surprised if you could buy a dvd player for that. It’s why I’d check all the outputs available first.
 

Profpointy

Legendary Member
I don’t believe there’s any difference in quality. It’s digital signal. It won’t degrade in a 2m cable with a cheap connector. Their output will be identical. It may break if pulled in and out a thousand times but it’s a dvd player and tv. It’ll be plugged in once and left. A cheap one will do the exact same job as a mid range and an expensive one.

Well, up to a point. By analogy, I tend to buy MK mains plugs which are slightly dearer than generic ones. They are just a bit better made and less likely to need fettling over time - eg the cord grip or loose screws. I don't get "better electricity" out of them but I feel it's worth a pound or two more as once it's on it never needs looking at again.

Admittedly they are plugged and unplugged more, but beefier phone cables do last longer than crappy ones. A bare minimum data cable might be at the edge of spec, and the software would need a bit more error correction or whatever. At work, we'd get ethernet cables and such from proper suppliers, with some element of provenance and testing associated with them. In the past I worked for a company who made RJ11 and RJ45 connectors and associated wiring cabinets and there was an immense amount of testing associated with the products despite being built to a tight cost for BT and the like. I remember my lodger, who also worked there, doing 10,000 insertions using the special tool, to check the quality.

Just to be clear, I'm not a believer in magic high fi cables for thousands of pounds or anything like that
 
Top Bottom