I have been straight with you throughout in saying that, regardless of the rights and wrongs of the advertising, I consider it a deeply inappropriate attitude to regard theatre as a commodity where one can demand a refund*.
I have been straight with you throughout that I do not support misleading advertising.
I have been straight with you throughout in saying that, in the absence of seeing the actual advertising concerned, I cannot form my own opinion as to whether the advertising was in fact misleading as to the essence of what you were buying a ticket to see, or merely only misleading if theatre is viewed with what I regard as a lamentably superficial and limited perspective.
Those are indeed unapologetically criticisms of your behaviours that you have described and defended with gusto. I do not consider any of them constitute a "personal attack" or an "erroneous fantasy".
*
for artistic reasons. I might reluctantly concede that a refund might be in order in the event of a total power cut preventing the performance going on.