Archie_tect
De Skieven Architek... aka Penfold + Horace
- Location
- Northumberland
True Cunobelin, the psychological problems of both conditions need treating too.
All of which again equally applies to the chronically underweight....
I've been thinking about this ....Why is it that cyclists expect the NHS to help them recover from injuries? After all they put themselves on the bike in the first place.
I would say that ultra-thin people are more likely to have a mental health issue whereas quite a few obese people are just lazy. Yes there's comfort eating which could be classed as a mental health issue but I'd argue that it isn't as far along the scale as bulimia is.For all the same reasons read the two together, why should one group be criticised and not the other?
Both extremes of BMI are dangerous to health, cost the NHS in treatment and it is surely rather hypocritical to choose to find one socially acceptable, and not the other?
It's nobody else's business what somebody's body shape is.
Of course we do, the poor road tax paying motorist picks up the bill to pay for our roadsSome cyclists expect everyone else to pick up the bill![]()
It is when you have to sit next to a fat women on a 5 hour flight and as she approaches her seat she ironicly says, "sorry, i'm next to you" as she squeezes into her seat. For the whole flight I was leaning over the edge of the seat as she overlapped into mine.. Now, while you could argue that the seats were not wide enough in the first place, I don't take up space in others seats.It's nobody else's business what somebody's body shape is.
My eldest daughter is 14, within normal BMI but at the higher end, and to her credit wanted to take up excercise, not wanting to jog in the street she expressed an interest in doing some Gym work. The commercial Gyms don't allow under sixteens to join guess it is an insurance issue plus maybe they see them as disruptive. The only Gym that allowed it was the local council one which is awful. It costs £13 a year to be member they do not allow her to join an unlimited membership but only pay as you go, at £2.10 per visit. I joined as well on unlimited at £36 per month. She goes 4 sometimes 5 x a week so is costing me £38-42 a month. She is only allowed to go between 4pm and 6pm Mon to Friday and is not allowed at all on a Sunday not sure about Saturday. Which is really short sighted and considering the Government want fitter youngsters I think both the cost and time restrictions are really silly. When you consider that the flashy well appointed Fitness First just up the road is £35.50 per month I a mamzed anyone uses the council one.The problem, I suspect with children (I don't have any, I'm basing this on my observations of others) is that many well intentioned parents are preventing their children from taking exercise due to a fear that is mostly created by the media about how "dangerous" it is out in the big bad world yet in reality it is probably safer than ever before.
It is when you have to sit next to a fat women on a 5 hour flight and as she approaches her seat she ironicly says, "sorry, i'm next to you" as she squeezes into her seat. For the whole flight I was leaning over the edge of the seat as she overlapped into mine.. Now, while you could argue that the seats were not wide enough in the first place, I don't take up space in others seats.
Disgraceful. I hope you tutted judgementally at her to indicate that you thought she was a social pariah who had no business being fat in public.
The problem is singling out a single group as unacceptable when the grounds for selection are not unique.