srw
It's a bit more complicated than that...
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/01/s...line-in-brain-injuries.html?pagewanted=1&_r=0
Well I never. Probably not a great surprise, and not directly relevant to cycling, but interesting nonetheless. Despite a massive increase in ski helmet wearing (and a rather high injury rate giving a decent population sample) there's been no corresponding fall in brain injury.
I confess my interest has been piqued by the multi-page spreads following the Schumacher injury (he was, incidentally, helmeted). In particular, I'm rather surprised by the number of articles alleging that skiing is safer than cycling. I believe that's what is known in the trade as complete and utter bollocks.
There's a widely cited stat that quotes 2 - 4 injuries (of any kind) per 1000 skier days. That is high in itself (1 per busload per week) but is also rather higher than the equivalent for cycling. CTC estimates something like 0.05 injuries per 1000 cyclist hours, which (based on a long 7 hour cycling day) translates to something like 0.35 injuries per 1000 cyclist days - something like an order of magnitude less.
The head injury stat seems to be based on a US stat of 17,000 head injuries in a year from 11 million skiers vs 85,000 head injuries from 47 million cyclists. It conveniently ignores the fact that skiing is a once-a-year activity for most skiers, rather heavily constrained by the weather.
If I'm feeling strong tomorrow I'll try for a Guardian correction or clarification. And there's something of a lesson there for the cycling industry - the skiing industry does its PR rather better.
Well I never. Probably not a great surprise, and not directly relevant to cycling, but interesting nonetheless. Despite a massive increase in ski helmet wearing (and a rather high injury rate giving a decent population sample) there's been no corresponding fall in brain injury.
I confess my interest has been piqued by the multi-page spreads following the Schumacher injury (he was, incidentally, helmeted). In particular, I'm rather surprised by the number of articles alleging that skiing is safer than cycling. I believe that's what is known in the trade as complete and utter bollocks.
There's a widely cited stat that quotes 2 - 4 injuries (of any kind) per 1000 skier days. That is high in itself (1 per busload per week) but is also rather higher than the equivalent for cycling. CTC estimates something like 0.05 injuries per 1000 cyclist hours, which (based on a long 7 hour cycling day) translates to something like 0.35 injuries per 1000 cyclist days - something like an order of magnitude less.
The head injury stat seems to be based on a US stat of 17,000 head injuries in a year from 11 million skiers vs 85,000 head injuries from 47 million cyclists. It conveniently ignores the fact that skiing is a once-a-year activity for most skiers, rather heavily constrained by the weather.
If I'm feeling strong tomorrow I'll try for a Guardian correction or clarification. And there's something of a lesson there for the cycling industry - the skiing industry does its PR rather better.