BentMikey said:Sorry Mate I Didn't See You is all.
Top tip - google phrases like this and you can nearly always find out what they mean, and come out looking knowledgeable.![]()
Tynan said:the problem is that so many cyclists are deficient in one way or another than drivers tend to be already pissed of with them, I suspect the percentage of cyclists that use the road properly, use decent lights and observe the rules of the road is rather small
a great deal of driver's rote criticisms of cyclists tend to be true for an awful lot of cyclists
sadly
Tynan said:absolutely, there's loads of points out there to be made that are very true
op was regarding drivers' opinions on bikes and things that formed their opinions though
I think more drivers drive well then cyclists ride though, I think more cyclists routinely jump lights and don't use lights or any sort of hi viz clothing
based on what I see on my commute through London anyway
As for Hi-Viz, each to their own.
Terminator said:What's wrong with Hi-Viz then?
It's made a lot of difference to my commute over the last ten years.
Origamist said:Nothing.
Interesting study here:
Conspicuity and bicycle crashes: preliminary findings of the Taupo Bicycle Study
http://injuryprevention.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/14/1/11
Dont tell BM this.Interesting. I don't have time to read all of this at the moment. Did they manage to account for the fact that cyclists who wear hi-viz would be more likely to be conscientious. On average I would suspect that this would be the case.