Do we really need a thread every time a cyclist dies? There are lots of people on the road at the moment, some will die. That is life. We're all going to die in the end.
Sad for her friends and family, but not for anyone else.
Do we really need a thread every time a cyclist dies? There are lots of people on the road at the moment, some will die. That is life. We're all going to die in the end.
Sad for her friends and family, but not for anyone else.
Do we really need a thread every time a cyclist dies? There are lots of people on the road at the moment, some will die. That is life. We're all going to die in the end.
Sad for her friends and family, but not for anyone else.
I would hope that we would all find the death of 21 year old young lady in such tragic circumstances a very sad event indeed.
Err yeah, did you read the article? She fell off of her own accord while riding on the pavement. A totally self inflicted incident.
You're not putting a great case forward by trying to blame fictional road users. Lets fight the issues that make a difference, like asking for more patience and wider passing.
Honestly i couldn't care less. I came to accept that lots of sad things happen every day, but unless i can do something about them, or unless they directly affect me, then there is no point in pretending to care. Through the internet and 24hr news you could engross yourself in stories much worse than this every minute of every day, but it wouldn't achieve anything. Me "feeling sad" about this is worthless, so it's best just to accept the facts of life and get on with it.
I'd say that to disregard a tragic death as meaningless unless we know the person is sad. So you should only feel sympathy for a person if they're related to you, or a close friend? Aren't we regarding human life as part of a machine and when that part dies(stops working)then we replace it, not cry over it?
Tyrannical regimes over the years have regarded human life as there to serve the state and "the cause". Not to be mourned over when gone, but to be used to serve the state and its ideals. I knew of such a person who believed in such ideals, he said that when a person is dead that's it! They have served their purpose now they are gone! He didn't believe in visiting graves, attending funerals, mourning etc.
If we think like this aren't we becoming detached from the meaning of life, which is to live and not serve?
Human life is cheap in many countries, as we have seen by constant bombings and other atrocities in troubled regions of the world. If we can dismiss a tragic accidental death as meaningless, unless we know the person, then aren't we becoming as hardened as the ones who kill at ease?
Yes - and the other articles linked to it. Which suggest that there may be more to it, and that your speculation may well be wrong.Err yeah, did you read the article?