jefmcg
Guru
Um, because they need an arena and a bureaucracy for every sport. Oh, and ticket buyers.Why ban anything?
Let them all in.
Um, because they need an arena and a bureaucracy for every sport. Oh, and ticket buyers.Why ban anything?
Let them all in.
I think Dwarf Flinging would be easy enough to put on, and you'd have no trouble finding an audience.Um, because they need an arena and a bureaucracy for every sport. Oh, and ticket buyers.
Ah you see, what we really need now is a Builders & Tradesman Olympics whereby BATO could nurture new & exciting sports such as ....Depends how well it's done, whether it's with concrete posts & gravel boards or just using wood posts.
I'll start...
Tennis
Golf
Football
Rugby 7s
Fencing
I've tried recurve target shooting. It's a lot harder than it looks. Bows (I think) are limited to a 70 pound pull - the bow I had was around 40 and I'd be feeling it by the end of a session. 72 arrows at 70 metres and the winner will get most of them in the centre. With the same gear I'd be pleased to get the distance and very happy to hit the target anywhere.Archery. Nobody moves a millimetre, nobody ever misses, the bows look like they have counterweights, laser guidance and heat-seeking capability built in. Ban the bloody sport unless they all have two hours to whittle their own bows out of willow before the competition starts.
I tried it once. I managed to hit the frame of the target, the pellet rebounded and hit me on the forehead. At that point, I decided it wasn't for me.Air pistol is bloody hard! We have a 10m competition shoot at the club and I have to rely on the excuse that I have nerve damage in both arms....![]()
Excellent idea. But it would make the whole thing significantly less marketable in the USofA. Being anywhere close to there when 'mercans are involved is painful, much worse than the UK.Oh and jingoism, there should be no preference for any country whatsoever, especially the UK.
I've tried recurve target shooting. It's a lot harder than it looks. Bows (I think) are limited to a 70 pound pull - the bow I had was around 40 and I'd be feeling it by the end of a session. 72 arrows at 70 metres and the winner will get most of them in the centre. With the same gear I'd be pleased to get the distance and very happy to hit the target anywhere.
Koreans are masters of it - it's the national sport. I read an article about a couple of UK coaches that went there to study their training methods. Apart from some big Corporations have a Company archer on the pay roll what amazed them was the trainees being expected to shoot a set of arrows then run to the target to retrieve them, again and again.
That said, apart from the team event it's not a great spectator sport, much like the trap shooting I've just watched.
Excellent idea. But it would make the whole thing significantly less marketable in the USofA. Being anywhere close to there when 'mercans are involved is painful, much worse than the UK.
Like many have said, get rid of all games where judging is involved - possibly unless you exclude the judges from countries where competitors are competing.
Curling - keep. Fantastic sport. Problem is it is great to play, not to watch. Rather like cycling'c TT's - get rid! A modern problem - sports these days tend to be included if they make good tv.
Archery. Nobody moves a millimetre, nobody ever misses, the bows look like they have counterweights, laser guidance and heat-seeking capability built in. Ban the bloody sport unless they all have two hours to whittle their own bows out of willow before the competition starts.