OP
OP
User169
Guest
I find it pretentious that someone thinks they can tell others what they should read.
Yebbut what's that got to do with this thread?
I find it pretentious that someone thinks they can tell others what they should read.
Well, given the title of the threadYebbut what's that got to do with this thread?
I think I need faster broadband - the chart doesn't load![]()
Well, given the title of the thread
Its heavy going unless you like that sort of thing or like me had a dad into zen and carlos Castaneda.I knew Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance would be in there. One of a handful of books I gave up on and never finished, but that was a good few years ago. What do others see in it that I missed, and is it worth another go?
. It reminds me that the list of stuff I haven't read includes some biggies of one kind or another, and leaves me once again wondering whether I should remedy the omissions and get stuck in to A Brief History of Time out of a sense of obligation, or just go "Meh" and remind myself that I can always ask some brainy cove like you or @marinyork to explain bits of it as needed. The irritatingness of the cloud/list is also its charm, I think. I expect all of us will feel that there are shocking omissions as well as utter dross and regrettably influential nut-jobbery, but then something being dross or nut-jobbery is not necessarily a reason not to read it. I had a young and brainy university lecturer who made FM look a bit book-shy, and he was genuinely anguished that first-year undergraduates would arrive without having read Ulysses, The Bible, and The Complete Works of Shakespeare. I can't remember whether I told him to lighten up. Anyway, we should each make our own non-fiction recommendations (sorry Spen) and start to assemble a CC consensus cloud. I will have a beer and a think... in that order.I'm putting forward Michael Jackson's Beer Companion.