yashicamat
New Member
- Location
- Macclesfield, Cheshire
MacB said:Having seen this sort of comment a fair bit I'm curious as to a bit more background. Are the DPs on your SS subjected to the same sort of braking extremes as the tourer? My obvious concern is whether it's comparing like for like. My understanding is that brakes, by power, are rated disc, v, DP and canti, but with a lot of poor canti performance being blamed on lower quality brakes and poor setup.
I believe the mechanical advantage of DPs is a lot better than cantilever brakes. The downside of this is the tolerance on the wheel (and the space available for the levers to work over, i.e., mudguard clearance is tiny and only narrow tyres will fit) is very very tight as the pads are only a few mm away from the wheel at rest. I believe V-brakes have a similar mechanical advantage, but it is achieved I think through changing the direction of the force applied, rather than through the use of several pivots as with DPs.
The braking performance between the tourer and the SS are not that incomparable with unloaded bikes. The SS is 5kg lighter than the tourer, but factor in the 75kg of me on it and the actual overall reduction in weight isn't massive. Obviously start strapping panniers etc. on the LHT and things change.
I personally would be slightly sceptical about having discs on a touring bike. I certainly wouldn't be happy using mechanical discs as I've generally found them inferior to V-brakes (although I may have been unlucky) and hydraulics, while they have been totally reliable and effective on the MTB so far, are just a liability I wouldn't want if cycling somewhere remote. Get a leak in the system and there's no way that can be fixed on the roadside. Cantis are so simple they are unlikely to go wrong, anything that does though can probably be fixed.

upsidedown: glad you've seen the light with turning the indexing off.
