beanzontoast
Guru
- Location
- South of The Peaks
Ever found yourself completing an online retailer's survey and you get to a question like: "On a scale of 1 to 10 where 10 is exceptionally good, do you think our product represents value for money?"
Imagine I think the product is really good value - works well (so I score it highly in those categories of the survey too), but costs less than I expected to pay. Surely if I (and lots of other people) score the product as 8, 9 or 10 on the 'value for money' scale, the marketing guys who analyse the data will think; "People have scored it highly in terms of how well it works so they obviously like it, yet they say it's relatively cheap. Hey - we're pricing this too low. Let's bump the price up." So by giving honest replies, the consumer risks shooting themselves in the foot!
Now obviously there are limits to how far a manufacturer / retailer can bump up a price without risking a fall in sales as the competing products start to become increasingly attractive. Unless, that is, they have a unique product or a brand line that 'locks in' the consumer in some design or function-related way.
Whenever I get to the 'value for money' question (as well as the 'how well do you think we compare against the competition?' type questions) I always err on the side of caution in my ratings.
Anyone else feel this way?
Imagine I think the product is really good value - works well (so I score it highly in those categories of the survey too), but costs less than I expected to pay. Surely if I (and lots of other people) score the product as 8, 9 or 10 on the 'value for money' scale, the marketing guys who analyse the data will think; "People have scored it highly in terms of how well it works so they obviously like it, yet they say it's relatively cheap. Hey - we're pricing this too low. Let's bump the price up." So by giving honest replies, the consumer risks shooting themselves in the foot!
Now obviously there are limits to how far a manufacturer / retailer can bump up a price without risking a fall in sales as the competing products start to become increasingly attractive. Unless, that is, they have a unique product or a brand line that 'locks in' the consumer in some design or function-related way.
Whenever I get to the 'value for money' question (as well as the 'how well do you think we compare against the competition?' type questions) I always err on the side of caution in my ratings.
Anyone else feel this way?