Team BKool CycleChat

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
@BILL S , @bridgy I see you both did the CG1 ... how did you find it? You both pushed out big power going downhill which is impressive. Could be really interesting on Thursday race night for the rest of us :okay:
Well, I don't know how to break this to you, but despite the appearance of the profile there's a bloomin great uphill at the start -quite steep in places too! Most of the down was in blue virtual speed so I was just pedalling to ensure I got a good workout, although I did put in some big efforts to get the speed up in the less steep downhill sections.

Would be an interesting one to do live with others....
 

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
Well, I don't know how to break this to you, but despite the appearance of the profile there's a bloomin great uphill at the start -quite steep in places too! Most of the down was in blue virtual speed so I was just pedalling to ensure I got a good workout, although I did put in some big efforts to get the speed up in the less steep downhill sections.

Would be an interesting one to do live with others....
I'm planning to do it live Thursday, baring any unforeseen circumstances, so hopefully there will be a few of us. Will need to get a head start then on @theboxers before the downhill starts :B)
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Zwift have said bkool won't give them the power data the pro etc generate to allow them to write or tweak a profile for the turbo. Nor will bkool write a calibration routine for users. Zwift cannot correct or account for how bkool have written the ant fec profile- it is unique to bkool.
I did read a blog post from Zwift explaining how they set the software up for the Bkool pro, along with other smart trainers - they used the trainers in zwift and compared with a power meter and adjusted the algorithm to suit each trainer. I was impressed with their openness as they explained the tyre width and tyre pressure etc. used in their calibration.

Obviously something's not right though based on Whorty's and several others experience, although personally I didn't have that kind of experience myself with my bkool pro on Zwift - I was generating lower watts than whorty did in zwift. Makes me wonder if it's some kind of hardware issue with some pro units not applying the required resistance for some reason?
 

Whorty

Gets free watts from the Atom ;)
Location
Wiltshire
I did read a blog post from Zwift explaining how they set the software up for the Bkool pro, along with other smart trainers - they used the trainers in zwift and compared with a power meter and adjusted the algorithm to suit each trainer. I was impressed with their openness as they explained the tyre width and tyre pressure etc. used in their calibration.

Obviously something's not right though based on Whorty's and several others experience, although personally I didn't have that kind of experience myself with my bkool pro on Zwift - I was generating lower watts than whorty did in zwift. Makes me wonder if it's some kind of hardware issue with some pro units not applying the required resistance for some reason?
Strange thing is I don't get it all the time. Twice now I've had super powers, but not every time. Last week it was feeling OK in the C race, this time I was definitely showing too much power. The difference (apart from tyre pressure) was this week was a flat course with no hills and last week there were a couple of lumps where I definitely felt the resistance kick in hard. Makes me wonder if the flat roads the resistance isn't changing on the trainer so when I go from say -1% to +1% the resistance is the same, I push more watts and it suddenly gives me more power. I am of course just clutching at straws!
 

bridgy

Legendary Member
Location
Cheddar
Strange thing is I don't get it all the time. Twice now I've had super powers, but not every time. Last week it was feeling OK in the C race, this time I was definitely showing too much power. The difference (apart from tyre pressure) was this week was a flat course with no hills and last week there were a couple of lumps where I definitely felt the resistance kick in hard. Makes me wonder if the flat roads the resistance isn't changing on the trainer so when I go from say -1% to +1% the resistance is the same, I push more watts and it suddenly gives me more power. I am of course just clutching at straws!
It is probably something like the software tells the trainer to apply a certain amount of resistance, but for some reason it doesn't apply enough. Because the resistance is lower than it should be this allows you to go faster, and then the watts are reported assuming the resistance is correct - which obviously means they are higher than they should be

Tyre pressure does make a difference, but not to the extent you're seeing
 
My power is pretty consistent between Zwift and BKOOL. The watts are a lot lower since the last BKOOL upgrade a while back. I think they are closer to reality.
I did the CG 1 and after the first 5 miles uphill I took it easy on the downhill so I had to stop early because I was going to be just over 30 minutes and my FTP expired.
 

AAAC 76C

Large Member
Location
LIVING THE DREAM
It is probably something like the software tells the trainer to apply a certain amount of resistance, but for some reason it doesn't apply enough. Because the resistance is lower than it should be this allows you to go faster, and then the watts are reported assuming the resistance is correct - which obviously means they are higher than they should be

Tyre pressure does make a difference, but not to the extent you're seeing

I agree with Bridgy.
I think BSims 'inertia' bolt on it nothing more than a delay.
If you are going great guns on the flat and hit an incline there will be a delay in resistance kicking in and if the hill is short enough and you commence a descent or flat before resistance kicks in it just misses it out hence you climb at the same speed as a flat.
I'm not sure if it grants you extra power for your speed and incline but you can certainly bat along like you are on fire.
The faster you go the longer the delay so the more you are gifted, it's almost a double unfairness against slower riders who in turn will be slowed by the ascent that you skipped over.
 

AAAC 76C

Large Member
Location
LIVING THE DREAM
Zwift have said bkool won't give them the power data the pro etc generate to allow them to write or tweak a profile for the turbo. Nor will bkool write a calibration routine for users. Zwift cannot correct or account for how bkool have written the ant fec profile- it is unique to bkool.

Probably because they have done so many bolt-ons in thier trainer FW they can't work out what it does now either.
 

bobinski

Legendary Member
Location
Tulse Hill
I agree with Bridgy.
I think BSims 'inertia' bolt on it nothing more than a delay.
If you are going great guns on the flat and hit an incline there will be a delay in resistance kicking in and if the hill is short enough and you commence a descent or flat before resistance kicks in it just misses it out hence you climb at the same speed as a flat.
I'm not sure if it grants you extra power for your speed and incline but you can certainly bat along like you are on fire.
The faster you go the longer the delay so the more you are gifted, it's almost a double unfairness against slower riders who in turn will be slowed by the ascent that you skipped over.

That's sounds right. My experience was that as Cadence dropped the bkool pro produced similar power output to the NEO. This meant it was closer to the neo going up anything over 4%( once initial Cadence/momentum from flat to incline had fizzled out )and almost identical on long inclines above 4%. I wonder if this would be the case with a stronger rider spinning rather than grinding up such inclines.
Don't forget in Zwift if you set the trainer "difficulty " at 50% you spin more for same power output/speed and it might mean that the way bkool power output is interpreted is further exaggerated? Whorty- you at 50 or 100% if less than 100 perhaps but it at 100?
 
Last edited:

CXRAndy

Guru
Location
Lincs
It really does say something when Bkool doesn't even get a mention in this list

20171004_080140.png
 

Breedon

Legendary Member
There was a Tacx setup, like the Atom, styled on the Neo, previewed at one of the bike shows. DCR was told 2.5-3k Euros for it when it launches next year. His reply was apparently "that's too much". iirc

Wattbike have stepped into a hole, where no one else is, with a very competitively priced offering. Yes it's £1500, but if it is as good as, or very close to, a neo/kickr + bike setup it'll seem cheap. It's up to everyone else to decide whether they want to play at that price point.
Too risky ... if I still produce big power I'd hate to be told I still race to an advantage. I'd rather stay Pro or get something others have.

I still think one of the biggest advantages of the Pro compared to a direct drive is the tyre, both type and PSI. You can't play a direct drive in the same way as you can a trainer with a tyre on a roller. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of my extra power last night was due to pumping the tyre back to 100 from 80
The only problem with a roller is wheel slip, and you can't stand out of the saddle with out losing some power and the chance of wheel slip.
With direct drive you have none of that on a sprint I can put down over 7 w/kg in power, stand up and carry on putting down the power, climbing hills is a joy and not a frustration.
Yes they do cost more but it is well worth the money no matter what the price and I'm glad I got it, and I would highly recommend any direct drive.
 
Top Bottom