I like Gareth Southgate, I think he is a ' good man' and based on his England results, even a good football manager. However, I think his recent stewardship is 'tainting' his legacy.
England, historically do not do well in tournaments in hot climates,
understandable really I suppose ? you cannot acclimatise in a few days. So why with a squad of 26 in hot conditions would you put such a heavy 'workload' on the same 11 players who started both games ? On his day and if fit Harry Kane is a great player. Kane's finishing and especially his distribution are world class. Conte, his manager said on 10th nov he (Kane) was "really, really tired" ! that is evidenced by Kane's performance in the 1st two games. Still he played the entire two games. Does Southgate feel 'obliged' to maximise Kane's chances of scoring the 2 goals needed to catch Rooney's England scoring record ? or doesn't he trust the squad players he selected. The difference in the energy and 'drive' shown by the likes of USA, Ecuador, KSA etc is a revelation compared to a lethargic England.
The possession football England are 'attempting' to play leaves players reluctant to attempt an incisive forward pass and risk losing the ball resulting in 'crab like' sideways football. For goodness sake tell the young 'tyros' i.e Saka, Bellingham, Foden etc to ' go for it' give us 60 mins of high energy football and then use your substitutes.
I never thought we would/could win this World cup but please let's play some high energy, attacking, attractive (I hope) football to remember.