StuAff
Silencing his legs regularly
- Location
- Portsmouth
Fingers crossed it gets resolved sharpish (don't want it affecting my return from Brussels either).
That'll probably mean @srw will be collected from Newhaven in the Wilcox courtesy car. Which would mean that there could be room for one other person, plus bike, for a destination between Newhaven and the M25, or up in the Amersham direction...I have just realised that the strike the RMT have called might affect train travel from Newhaven when we get back.
Can I register an interest please? I am booked with bike & Loved One on the 1600 Wednesday train Kings X to Aberdeen on the way to Orkney so don't have much spare time. However your route may not get me significantly closer to east London.....there could be room for one other person
I have just realised that the strike the RMT have called might affect train travel from Newhaven when we get back.
Good lord, that's a lot of climbing…
thankyou, Adam. The first day and the first 40 miles of the second day are indeed flat. There are, as your splendid ride sections make clear, two hills in the last twenty miles to Honfleur - both are walkers.Sorry for the delay, but I've finally got around to going over the gpx files.
Bear in mind they don't account of any possible excursions such as above, and are based on whatever the new version of Google maps thought Simon had in mind, so hopefully they line up ok.
Day 1 Brix to Bayeux - 65 miles, 2,200 ft. of climbing, quite flat really.
Day 2 Bayeux to Honfleur - 59 miles, 2,350 ft. of climbing, couple of big hills (one of which is a tad steep, so don't blame me but it's got a nice view at the top).
Day 3 Honfleur to Dieppe - 70 miles, 3,257 ft. of climbing, bit of a drag up to a plateau, but nothing steeper than 7.8%, and I can see a lovely descent like Slugwash Lane, only longer with a thatched cottage thrown in.
You'll love it.
Scaremongering? I merely pointed out that compared to where I'll be riding, it's a lot of climbing. But that's only relative. The elevation graph for large parts of Flanders is a straight line.....Back to the hilliness "scaremongering"....
Isn't 1000 meters of climbing per 100k considered a standard i.e. not notably flat or hilly? Audax UK requires 1500m of climbing in 100k for an organiser to apply for AAA points to be awarded to those completing.
The hilliest day is 3,257 feet of climbing over 70 miles. That's just about 1,000 meters of climbing in 112.5k so flatter than the 'standard'. Bring it on.![]()
Our route will most likely be round to the A23, then straight up and round the M25 - if that's any use you are welcome to a lift. Where in East London are you trying to get to?Can I register an interest please? I am booked with bike & Loved One on the 1600 Wednesday train Kings X to Aberdeen on the way to Orkney so don't have much spare time. However your route may not get me significantly closer to east London.....
The trouble with stats like this is that it all depends on the method of calculating height gain, and the granularity of the height database. Looking closely at Dodo's graphs, ridewithgps.com seems to be counting a lot of tiny little ups (which may just be noise in the height database) as climbing. Other websites might well smooth them out.Back to the hilliness "scaremongering"....
Isn't 1000 meters of climbing per 100k considered a standard i.e. not notably flat or hilly? Audax UK requires 1500m of climbing in 100k for an organiser to apply for AAA points to be awarded to those completing.
The hilliest day is 3,257 feet of climbing over 70 miles. That's just about 1,000 meters of climbing in 112.5k so flatter than the 'standard'. Bring it on.![]()
From the wings of this rarified debate I'd like to say how proud I am to be a member of a cycling club where such phrases are in common parlance.the granularity of the height database. ...... the vagaries of mathematical modelling)
Mine will be assisted by the incorporation into my luggage of at least one bottle of wine for the journey.Normandie Express shuffles....