Guilty as charged but currently out on bail awaiting pre-sentencing reports is how I read the current state of affairs.
Added to which
significant, well small but vocal, section of the "cycling public" dissatisfied with HOW the verdict was reached rather than WITH the verdict itself.
significant, smaller but equally vocal, section of the "cycling public" wondering why the focus is on Armstrong (scapegoating?) when he clearly was effectively only the most prominent public symptom of systematic, widespread, institutionalised cheating which was done with the knowledge, and the active collusion, of the so-called cycling regulatory authorities of the time.