AndyRM
XOXO
- Location
- North Shields
This could be career suicide for Alistair McGowan.
Personally not something I would want to go and see, but equally I don't want to see The Jeremy Kyle Show, TOWIE, The X Factor, Britain's Got Talent, the Voice or anything else like that so you know what? I don't watch them! I don't preach to those that do and wouldn't presume to (I do just think they are generally brain dead morons - I just don't tell them - not that I am concerned in any way - just they wouldn't understand my half of the argument)
Slightly off topic but I was one of the @ 5000 men tested in the Linda Mann/Dawn Ashworth murders and the guy who killed them was not caught by his DNA, he was caught because the workmate who took the test for him spoke about it in a pub called the Clarenden in Leicester and this was overheard and reported to the Police. I wonder if this will come out in pt2.Springtime for Hitler
We do seem to have lots of "entertainment" based on victims. Sweeny Todd, although fictional seems rather in bad taste with song and dance routines while dispatching victims. There was some rather horrid thing on TV at the weekend about DNA fingerprinting based on a true case. Surely the victims family is still around.
On from there we have lots of crimes turned into films, like the great train robbery and McVicar which I think were both written or at least had input from the criminals themselves profiteering from their crime.
I feel people should have the freedom to produce the art they wish to produce but really the public could be a bit more selective in what they pay to see.
Then of course it is OK to do what you want if you are Michael Jackson and settle out of court. You still get your music played.
This could be career suicide for Alistair McGowan.
Personally not something I would want to go and see, but equally I don't want to see The Jeremy Kyle Show, TOWIE, The X Factor, Britain's Got Talent, the Voice or anything else like that so you know what? I don't watch them! I don't preach to those that do and wouldn't presume to (I do just think they are generally brain dead morons - I just don't tell them - not that I am concerned in any way - just they wouldn't understand my half of the argument)
Slightly off topic but I was one of the @ 5000 men tested in the Linda Mann/Dawn Ashworth murders and the guy who killed them was not caught by his DNA, he was caught because the workmate who took the test for him spoke about it in a pub called the Clarenden in Leicester and this was overheard and reported to the Police. I wonder if this will come out in pt2.
Yes, but the police 'interview. techniques were pretty brutal. If what happened to my mates brother, who was subjected to them despite being at home with his family (not believed by the cops at the time) happened to the lad who did eventually confess then I'm not surprised that he did.Ah, ok, but it did help eliminate the prime suspect (who admitted to the murders for some reason) at a time when such processes were unheard of. Right?
True, but that 'horrid' thing to which you refer was just as much the story of how an unrelated scientific discovery gradually developed into the meeting between Science and Police work and the forensic police investigations we have today.
It followed the first (admittedly unfortunate) cases where it was used as well as what the Scientists did at Leicester University to create the intial breakthrough of being able to record everyone's individual DNA, to develop what had originally been meant as little more than a paternity test and then help the Police after being asked, to apply it to work it had never been intended for, with clear success!
In terms of the number of dangerous people who otherwise would probably still be walking the streets, but instead have been put behind bars, as well as those who have been proven innocent over the past 30 years, I see it as anything but 'horrid'. It changed so much, regardless of how accurate the dramatisation may or may not be!
Oh, and I doubt they would have done it without the permission of the families, do you?
Surely even they can see the good that came out of it. Yes, I bet they wished it had happened another way, but, it didn't.
Yes, but the police 'interview. techniques were pretty brutal. If what happened to my mates brother, who was subjected to them despite being at home with his family (not believed by the cops at the time) happened to the lad who did eventually confess then I'm not surprised that he did.
It won't be.
The gulf between this play and the programmes you've highlighted is vast.
The TV 'dramatisation' portrayal doesn't even come close to what Geoff's brother was put through, despite the fact that he was at home with both his parents.Yeah the Police were a bit.... Err, rough and ready in the first episode until they realised what they had, or at least, the chief investigator did anyway.
The TV 'dramatisation' portrayal doesn't even come close to what Geoff's brother was put through, despite the fact that he was at home with both his parents.
At the time family members were not believed as an 'alibi'.
Slightly off topic but I was one of the @ 5000 men tested in the Linda Mann/Dawn Ashworth murders and the guy who killed them was not caught by his DNA, he was caught because the workmate who took the test for him spoke about it in a pub called the Clarenden in Leicester and this was overheard and reported to the Police. I wonder if this will come out in pt2.
All I know is that it left one totally innocent 15yr old lad quite traumatised for a couple of years and he wasn't the only one they took in for 'questioning'.Not excusing violence, but taking alibis as Gospel truth is never going to happen.
In many cases the family, friends or workmates will provide an alibi or other proof that is false. This needs to be checked and investigated. Take the example above