lukesdad said:...... now you have lost me......
....you have been listening to Jimbo too long.You better go and have a lie down.
![]()
AndyJB said:Did they consider the recovery time, this could indicate the level of effort and the delay back to full excursion.
Lance did indeed use a high spin rate because it suited him that doesn't mean that because he won the TdF it should therefore be suitable for everyone.lukesdad said:Someone better tell Lance then.
MacB said:he may have been spinning too much, it's known to have a negative mental impact. Though neanderthal in appearance the grinders are far the intellectual superiors of the spinners
lukesdad said:Obviously,but not in their approach to cycling,unfortunate ....that.All that expenditure on a sport they dont understand .....its a shame!![]()
peanut said:Lance did indeed use a high spin rate because it suited him that doesn't mean that because he won the TdF it should therefore be suitable for everyone.
You lose your argument by the very reason you gave to advocate a high spin rate for all.
Miguel Indurain was every bit as sucessful as Lance whether time trialling climbing sprinting or winning the TdF and he used a low cadence.
Why do you think that might have been ? I'll give you a clue ... consider his morphology, physiology and body weight in comparison to Lance ....![]()
peanut said:you are becoming rather tiresome and not a little irritating
why don't you stop flaming and try to add something constructive to the debate .?![]()
rich p said:Correct me if I'm wrong but this is Cafe not Training?
peanut said:you are becoming rather tiresome and not a little irritating
why don't you stop flaming and try to add something constructive to the debate .?![]()
MacB said:If I could correct you I would Rich, it hurts me to have to agree with you
lukesdad said:and im 05 in dec.
.
lukesdad said:can still do a sub hour 25 tt on an 18 year old rigid mtb with compact 26s and cheap profile clip ons.