Very sweet, moving condom advert.

Page may contain affiliate links. Please see terms for details.

thomas

the tank engine
Location
Woking/Norwich
probably...:biggrin:

Quite good.
 

ComedyPilot

Secret Lemonade Drinker
Might make girls think about being 'used'.

You don't have to spread your legs to be popular. What upbringing and values did the parents give their girls, so they have so little self-esteem, that they need to shag all and sundry just to feel a sense of belonging?

I am now going back to the 40's, ta ra.
 
OP
OP
S

stoptherock

New Member
She is having fun, meeting people who may or may not be suitable, having lots of red hot rumpy pumpy and how's your father and staying safe.

God bless her.
 
U

User169

Guest
Good stuff. Surely having sex without a condom should be made a criminal offence. Think about it - it would eliminate STDs at a stroke and, in time, would help to solve any problems of over-population. (Those wishing to procreate could apply for a “bareback licence” from their local authority renewable after one year and priced at say £50 to cover the admin). I hope someone can take note of this and raise it at the next really big important meeting. Thanks.
 

Joe24

More serious cyclist than Bonj
Location
Nottingham
Im sure ****ing a girl in the crapper is illegal, but there are people that still do it.
I doubt making it illegal to **** a girl without a condom will do much.

I think its more preassure from friends, and wanting to be having sex young to look more grown up and show off to their friends is what is making girls, and guys, do it younger.
Not just a low self esteem, more then wanting to be like their older sisters/friends, and the boys want to be older and be getting it.

A while ago i was looking for some advice, and while on a yahoo site, a 13 year(was 13 i think, although 11 is in my head:wacko:) old asked a question. His question was something like, his GF has been giving him head for a while, and she normaly spits but she swallowed, then the day after was sick. Could she be pregnent.
All the answers came back that she wasnt, and that they are way too young to be doing anything.
They dont understand much about it, but yet they are still doing it:wacko:

The other thing, which me and my GF think is bad, is that my GF went to get a C card from her school. The woman asked her if she was going on the pill, my GF said yes and the person said she would give her a C card, but really she doesnt need to use condoms.
Now, me and my GF prefere to use both, but surely you shouldnt be told this? My GF is not a slag, and she doesnt sleep around, she wanted to wait until she was 18 to have sex(was happy doing other things before) which i was fine with. Although, she mentioned it to some friends and they all thought she was crazy for wanting to wait! Peer preasure.

And the other thing me and my GF dont agree with, is that a 15 year old can now go and be tested for chlamydia secretly.
Its not that we dont agree with being tested for it at that age, but we think that if your shagging around, not being safe, then you should have to have a parent there to be tested for it.
Although, i suppose it means that more people can be tested, but 15 and being able to just go to be tested we thought was abit wrong.(although there is bound to be someone say that its fine because they are being tested and it could cut down on it spreading, which i sort of agree with, just the fact it can be done without parents knowing)
But then, there is nothing to say that people of that age couldnt get checked secretly before. You can get testing kits sent in the post, so you could lie about age and get one and be tested.

Anyway, enough of me woffling on, sorry, gone off on one
 
OP
OP
S

stoptherock

New Member
Im sure ****ing a girl in the crapper is illegal,

Good grief.
 

Wigsie

Nincompoop
Location
Kent
Delftse Post said:
Good stuff. Surely having sex without a condom should be made a criminal offence. Think about it - it would eliminate STDs at a stroke and, in time, would help to solve any problems of over-population. (Those wishing to procreate could apply for a “bareback licence” from their local authority renewable after one year and priced at say £50 to cover the admin). I hope someone can take note of this and raise it at the next really big important meeting. Thanks.

Can you imagine the types of volunteers you would get to go 'under cover' investigating those filthy fiends that have unprotected sex! ;)

Joe24 said:
Its not that we dont agree with being tested for it at that age, but we think that if your shagging around, not being safe, then you should have to have a parent there to be tested for it.

I think the point here is that if you 15 and you need a test you are less likely to face your folks and get a bollocking and be embarrassed at the same time than if you could go in private. When i was 'under age' most things needed parental consent or knowledge and was difficult.
 
U

User169

Guest
Wigsie said:
Can you imagine the types of volunteers you would get to go 'under cover' investigating those filthy fiends that have unprotected sex! ;)


Genital tagging should cover it I reckon.
 

vernon

Harder than Ronnie Pickering
Location
Meanwood, Leeds
Delftse Post said:
Good stuff. Surely having sex without a condom should be made a criminal offence. Think about it - it would eliminate STDs at a stroke and, in time, would help to solve any problems of over-population. (Those wishing to procreate could apply for a “bareback licence” from their local authority renewable after one year and priced at say £50 to cover the admin). I hope someone can take note of this and raise it at the next really big important meeting. Thanks.

Are you volunteering to be an enforcer/inspector to make sure that unlicensed sex is not taking place.......
 

Wigsie

Nincompoop
Location
Kent
Joe24 said:
What?;)
Am i wrong?

Did you mean in a public toilets? if so, I think its probably against some public order act!

If you mean in her... erm... well maybe in a few states in the American Bible Belt, but perfectly ok over her... legal wise.
 

Joe24

More serious cyclist than Bonj
Location
Nottingham
Wigsie said:
Did you mean in a public toilets? if so, I think its probably against some public order act!

If you mean in her... erm... well maybe in a few states in the American Bible Belt, but perfectly ok over her... legal wise.

In sex ed, the man hater of a woman we had teaching us told us all it was sodamy and illegal.
She was a complete man hater though ;)
 
Top Bottom