My letter got published ... albeit slightly edited:
http://www.independe...em-2296153.html
"If Julie Burchill used a case of a mentally ill black man murdering someone as justification for calling black people "psychopaths", there would be justifiable outrage, and she would rightly be seen as using an unfortunate incident as an excuse to promote personal prejudice. Sadly this is exactly what she did in her comment about cyclists.
"I hope that The Independent will never stop printing controversial views. But Ms Burchill's invective, as evidenced by this piece, is intellectually dishonest."
For comparison, here's the unedited version:
"I hope that The Independent will never stop printing controversial views and challenging articles: that is one of the reasons I enjoy reading it. But Ms Burchill's predictable invective, as evidenced by this piece, manages to be both boring and intellectually dishonest (or lazy) - not qualities I would expect from The Independent."